User talk:J. Telmot
Welcome
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
J. Telmot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet.
Decline reason:
Then can you explain why you were repeating the same edits as two other users who were blocked? Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. |
AlistairMcMillan (talk) 01:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
but im not a sockpuppet
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
J. Telmot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i read the talk page and i agree that its based on multics
Decline reason:
Does not address the block. Stephen 01:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Obvious sockpuppet
[edit]Disruptive user has been pushing his POV on the Mac OS X talk page for a few days now. No other editors support his completely unique point of view. When he broke the 3RR and edit warring rules he was blocked yesterday. His block expired and he immediately started edit warring again. So I blocked him again for 24 hours at 00:28, September 18, 2009. At 01:28, this account was created and started making exactly the same unique POV edits. An obvious sock-puppet. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 01:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
do you have any proof
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
J. Telmot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
all i did was edit the page. i agreed with someone that its based on multics. u should have more evidence than that.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.