User talk:J. Gordon Gomez

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to McMaster Marauders— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 13:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to McMaster Marauders. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 13:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at McMaster Marauders, you may be blocked from editing. Hayman30 (talk) 13:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at McMaster University.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: McMaster University was changed by J. Gordon Gomez (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9444 on 2017-06-26T13:19:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

J. Gordon Gomez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a sockpuppet and would like to be unblocked. I just make Wikipedia humorous place. J. Gordon Gomez (talk) 13:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 13:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.