User talk:Iychapur

This is Iychapur's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist) (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 11:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iychapur! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 11:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist) (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Alpha3031 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The referencing requirements surrounding biographies of living persons is especially strict, to avoid both being promotional or risking defaming someone, among other reasons. We need sources that are writing about the person and not their work, and they need to be of the highest quality. Please also note that exclamatory language like "brilliant student" is considered promotional and should be avoided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist) (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is essentially a press release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: H.R. Economics (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:H.R. Economics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:H.R. Economics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DannyS712 (talk) 06:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: H.R. Economics (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reliable sources do not support the assertions of the article. "World's 3rd Economic Model since after Capitalism and Socialism" is an enormous claim to make, and nobody other than the proponent of this "theory" has seriously made that claim. Additionally the style of the article is promotional

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:H.R. Economics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:H.R. Economics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pi (Talk to me!) 19:31, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Sharma and HR Economics

Hi, I wondered if you might have a personal connection to Deepak Sharma and HR Economics.

If so, then have a look at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest regarding Wikipedia policies regarding editing or creating articles to which you have a personal connection Pi (Talk to me!) 21:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Hi, I'm happy to help with the submission process of articles, however in the case of this specific article the reason I rejected the submission is because:

The article is about a new theory, which does not have adequate coverage in independent reliable sources.
The article claims that H.R. Economics as a concept is a major branch of economics, comparable to capitalism and communism. This point is manifestly unsupported by any mainstream sources, quoted in the article or otherwise.
The article is written in a promotional tone that makes grand claims about the theory and Deepak Sharma. For example Deepak Sharma also known as father of H.R. Economics and Therefore, this proposal is attracting worldwide media attention
The content of the article insofar is it describes the field of economics generally suggest something of a lack of knowledge of economics. For example the description of "capitalism" and "socialism"/"communism" (those two being used interchangeably) as the two main economic systems is at best a great over-simplification of the field of Econommics.
The article does not adequately describe the subject. I have read it and am still at a loss as to what H.R. Economics actually is as a theory, including whether this is a descriptive theory or a proposal to make a new system of political economy.
The standard of written English leaves something to be desired. This is not a problem in itself, I would normally be quite happy to make some corrections to the grammar and spelling in an otherwise good article, and I appreciate the contributions of people who are not native speakers of English, however as I can't really understand the meaning of the article I can't do this.

I am not sure whether this article is ever going to meet the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia, which would require the topic to be covered in independent reliable sources, however if it is to be included, I think the article requires a substantial re-write that more realistically describes the very limited status of this theory within the field of Economics.

I asked before, but I will ask again. I was of the impression that you might have a connection to Deepak Sharma, I wondered if you would say whether this is the case?

Pi (Talk to me!) 00:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: H.R. Economics (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:H.R. Economics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:H.R. Economics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 13:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepak Sharma (Economist and Jurist) (September 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The changes since the last review have madet he article even more promotional

DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:H.R. Economics

Hello, Iychapur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "H.R. Economics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]