User talk:Ivens Portugal

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Ivens Portugal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rio de Janeiro neighborhoods

Hi! As you moved several Rio de Janeiro neighborhood pages, can you also fix the links in the Template:Rio de Janeiro city neighbourhoods? Regards, --Carioca (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I was about to finish moving/creating non-official neighborhoods in Rio. Once I finish, I will fix all links in the template. ivens (talk) 21:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. Regards, --Carioca (talk) 21:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marechal Hermes, Rio de Janeiro may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Brazil-geo-stub]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria da Graça, Rio de Janeiro may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Brazil-geo-stub]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Olaria, Rio de Janeiro may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Brazil-geo-stub]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UPPs

Thanks for helping with the wikilinks and uniformity on this article. Filling in that graph has been tedious from the start so it's appreciated! I changed one of the names to Santa Marta in order to coincide with the official name of the UPP, even though I prefer the name Dona Marta. Evenrød (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Just lemme know if I can help more. (btw, what is the correct way of answering a "talk" post like that? tx)

Cool. Your comments are formatted just fine. At the end each new comment on a talk page simply type four tilde symbols so that the system can generate your name and time/date. Evenrød (talk) 22:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil subdivisions pattern

Hi. While I like your suggestions (but I dislike moving a city page to "city name, state acronym"), usually a page is moved only when its name is ambiguous. There is no need to move all pages, as some page moves are too controversial (like moving Belo Horizonte to Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais) and in those cases it is better to start a page move discussion first. There is no need to move the Rio de Janeiro neighborhoods back, just when moving a city or state you need to see if the name is ambiguous or not and in the case of potentially controversial moves like states and big/historically relevant cities it is better to start a page move discussion first. Hope that helps. Regards, --Carioca (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neighbourhoods in Rio de Janeiro

Hello, I don't know if you're still around, but I guess you should know that I moved back every Rio de Janeiro neighborhood article that you moved to "Neighborhood, Rio de Janeiro", and I have also moved every article you created with similar titles when there was no need for it. We don't normally disambiguate pages unless there is another page with that exact title. Adding unnecessary disambiguation terms to articles titles may confuse newcomers and create extra unwelcome difficulties when it comes to linking articles and handling templates. Cheers, Victão Lopes ^Fala! 04:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Village, Rio de Janeiro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Village, Rio de Janeiro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Village, Rio de Janeiro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mato Alto

The article Mato Alto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks WP:SOURCES, last Edit 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]