User talk:IveFoundit
September 2008
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Jajah. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. removed promotional reference to Jaxtr ErnestVoice (User) (Talk) 13:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:IveFoundit
[edit]User:IveFoundit, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:IveFoundit and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:IveFoundit during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 00:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- I've closed the discussion as keep however you may want to consider a couple of points:
1) The main user page is normally used for information about the editor and not for draft articles (though there is no rule to this effect). Article drafts are usually maintained at a subpage such as User:IveFoundit/Jaxtr or User:IveFoundit/Sandbox. 2) We don't usually keep article drafts long term in user space, especially after they have become articles. You may want to remove the draft now that the article is up (and has survived AfD as well). If you have further questions about user space, please consult with me or any of the active editors and admins at WP:MfD.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 08:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Jaxtr
[edit]I have nominated Jaxtr, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaxtr. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 00:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- This was closed as keep by another editor.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 08:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loomia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loomia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jackfork (talk) 00:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loomia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loomia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jackfork (talk) 00:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)