User talk:Ivc4137

Welcome!

Hello, Ivc4137, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bhuvan Bam have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Ivc4137~~ Ivc4137 (talk) 05:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parmish Verma (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wiki's, IMDb and Youtube can't be references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parmish Verma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Parmish Verma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ivc4137! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 04:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my user account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ivc4137 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my user account was blocked from editing because my ip address was used from different user account:Vivek Chourasia. i understood why my account is blocked. i admit i violate wikipedia policy. i will never make a disruptive edit. i will make useful wikipedia contribution

Decline reason:

The autoblock is working as intended. You can request an unblock from your original account. clpo13_(talk) 22:58, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As this account is not blocked directly, in order to help you we need to know what your IP address is. If you do not wish to share it publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to request an unblock. 331dot (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Try editing again - I believe you're no longer blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 20:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @331dot and PhilKnight: I believe this actually is Vivek Courasia. See the very similar unblock request here. clpo13_(talk) 21:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - And also how similar this username is to Vc4137. clpo13_(talk) 21:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yeah, he's clearly admitting above to using the Vivek Chourasia account, which is currently indeffed. This account should be indeffed as well. This guy has had at least three other accounts, Vivek Chourasia, Vc4137, Vivek Chourasia vc4137, Vcksg4137 (check deleted edits as well) and perhaps a few others. User seems oblivious to editing norms, hasn't responded to notices or warnings, and I have serious competency concerns. User tried five times to create an article on himself. Since he's trying to edit again, it also seems they're apathetic toward our "do not use multiple accounts for nefarious purposes" rule. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      - Done. Vivek, if you want to request an unblock, you should do so only on the oldest account you have access to. You'll also need to explain in detail that you understand Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and list what topics you intend to edit if unblocked. Reviewing administrators aren't going to unblock based on a simple "I won't do it again" when you've created this many accounts to edit promotionally with. clpo13_(talk) 22:57, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock Unblock

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.

If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
Try to edit the Sandbox.
If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.
If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
1. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
2. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.
  If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.

Ivc4137 (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]