User talk:Ivanshanti
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jjpits, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://jjpits.googlepages.com/home. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 12:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Jjpits, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Jjpits. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Karada 12:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
September 2015
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)- Your edits here consisted of a promotional article which was also a copyright violation, and an article which you subsequently promoted via spamlinks. Drmies (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Ivanshanti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I saw news items in the local newspapers that seemed to have sufficient value, interest and mentions which is why I decided to create a stub on Reelmonk. I am not a regular user but do not take that to mean I do not care for the encyclopedia. Since I am learning how to edit and contribute to Wikipedia, I proceeded with one topic and editing and modifying articles so that I may understand how referencing and citations work
Decline reason:
It's pretty obvious from your edits that you engage in spamming. Compare for example [https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Unto_the_Dusk&type=revision&diff=679214350&oldid=678294834 these edits. You haven't addressed that concern at all. Huon (talk) 18:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ivanshanti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Intentions must not be judged from actions but rather a person's actions must be interpreted from his intentions. Like I explained before I was gauging and trying to understand how Wikipedia references articles and links. I updated pages of various movies that were hosted in the platform to understand how Google then catalogues Wikipedia references. You may also notice that I took efforts to update only pages of noteworthy films which have faced difficulty finding releases in theatres here in Kerala and have taken to releasing online as their fait accompli. Unto The Dusk happens to be an award winning film which has suffered badly at the hands of an industry controlled and operated by heavyweight commercial film producers. These facts cannot be presented on Wikipedia because there is no corroboration for this and these are purely public opinion here in Kerala which is why I chose to only highlight the online release aspect. To judge me as not here to contribute to the encyclopedia is harsh considering that I do contribute to Wikipedia about news that I find at the time to be budding from Kerala. I contributed to the article about Dr. Jose Chacko Periappuram years ago before he became the nationally recognised Padmashree award winner today because I felt the news about him was important then. The only post I have contributed which is unworthy of Wikipedia is about JJPits, which I admit is a failing on my part. However, I was a child then and unable to judge the notability of a website that was created by some friends in school. Please do unblock the account because otherwise I will simply create another account for myself and continue to contribute to the encyclopedia in a manner I see fits with the Wikipedia guidelines.
Decline reason:
This unblock request shows that you aren't here to build an encyclopaedia. Any sockpuppetry will be addressed with blocks of those accounts. Your note below doesn't provide any confidence that you actually understand the policies either. —SpacemanSpiff 16:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Threatening to evade your block with a sockpuppet is a surefire way to get your unblock request rejected out of hand. I would suggest removing or striking the implication from your unblock request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I rescind the last line of my unblock request. It stands changed to "Please do unblock my account so that I may continue contributing to the encyclopedia in what small way I can." -Ivan
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reelmonk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reelmonk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Adding below all the articles I have come across regarding the topic.
Reporting launch:
http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/malayalam-films-to-be-available-online-on-release-day/ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/Latest-Mollywood-flicks-to-be-available-online-abroad/articleshow/48138740.cms http://gulfnews.com/life-style/celebrity/desi-news/south-india/website-aims-to-tackle-malayalam-piracy-1.1554002 http://www.mathrubhumi.com/youth/features/562452/
Reporting other activities : http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/Reelmonk-Tracks-Down-Pirates/2015/07/24/article2937098.ece http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/films-move-out-of-cinemas/article7436607.ece
TV Reports on Anti Piracy activities : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryLM7m1O4OU
no idea if that does not fall into criteria of notability