User talk:IvanaPorcic/sandbox

Great job! i think you made some really good edits and you kept a very neutral tone through out. I agree that the article was missing the clinical diagnoses section so it's really good that you added it. The only thing I'm confused about is are the last two parts on your edit suggestions? Are those just extra links for people to check out? I think they add to the article so it would be nice if you could somehow include/ explain them.

Emmamde (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! Those are some additional sources that I will hopefully add with a brief mention of the similarity to Anorexia (the misdiagnosis individual's usually get) as well as the onset! (IvanaPorcic (talk) 17:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]