User talk:Ivan Ivancovich
July 2010
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Community (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:33, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Community (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:34, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to The Simpsons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TbhotchTalk C. 04:39, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|your reason here}}
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 04:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ivan Ivancovich (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 76.217.110.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
[[WP:Vandalism-only account|Vandalism-only account]]
- Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Ivan Ivancovich (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like to request an unblock from editing due to the fact that I now realize the information I posted was untrue. I had "Googled" the information that I had falsely posted, and I thought that it was true. I do realize how stupid of a mistake it is and truly apologize. A mistake like I made will not happen in the future.
Decline reason:
No, you were just making crap up, and vandalizing articles. You were also warned to stop, and simply ignored those notifications - it took blocking you to stop of the problems. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ivan Ivancovich (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Becuase of course, you would know my reasoning for doing something right? And anyway thoose warnings came only after I had already posted the information, idiot.
Decline reason:
Congratulations! You have just lost the ability to edit your own talk page! If you would like to appeal this block further, you will need to send an email to arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.