Jump to content

User talk:Itsrobloxhereyt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome Itsrobloxhereyt!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 39,497,326 registered editors!
Hello Itsrobloxhereyt. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Suneye1, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, SUN EYE 1 15:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Imzadi1979. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Missouri Route 370 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Imzadi 1979  21:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MO- 370 must be an interstate because it has everything that an interstate would. (auxiliary-wise.) Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 110 in Missouri moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, U.S. Route 110 in Missouri, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 17:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For more information about the highway, Please see the CKC page. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 18:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Three digit Us routes don’t have to end or start or have an interchange with the us route with the last 2 digits of the number. For example: US 412 is in Missouri, but a US 12 is nowhere near Missouri, but there still is a US 412. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 00:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

US 400, US 412 and US 425 are exceptions to the rule. Otherwise, yes, they would meet their parent two-digit highway. US 110 would need to meet US 10 at least once. The highway in Missouri is "Missouri Route 110", not US 110. The Special Committee on U.S. Route Numbering (SCURN) of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) would have to approve the use of a new "US 110" designation. We have an index to all of the SCURN meeting meetings back to 1967 at WP:USRD/AASHTO, complete with links to the minutes, and such a designation has never been approved for the Chicago–Kansas City Expressway in Missouri. Imzadi 1979  00:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note. This is done to avoid confusion of MO-110 in Jefferson county. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 00:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for that? AASHTO hasn't approved the designation, or it would be indexed at WP:USRD/AASHTO and listed in a set of meeting minutes uploaded to their website. Wishing something were true doesn't make it true. Imzadi 1979  00:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ik. There are two MO-110 in Missouri, and the one and only MO-110 is in Jefferson County. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 00:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not confuse this highway with the CKC. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 00:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois Route 799 moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Illinois Route 799, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 19:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For more information, please see the MLK bridge page. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 19:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:U.S. Route 110 in Missouri has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:U.S. Route 110 in Missouri. Thanks! Imzadi 1979  00:18, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Illinois Route 799 has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Illinois Route 799. Thanks! Imzadi 1979  00:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

[edit]

On it, you make the request: "Do not undo any edits I make on pages :)". Such a request is futile. Above the edit window it says, "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions." None of those conditions allow you to request others not revert you additions.

Additionally, please stop editing articles to change the type of highway in the infobox. You're breaking articles, and even if you're reverting your change, your series of edits still appear on other editors' watch pages, clogging them up. Imzadi 1979  01:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

K. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 01:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Missouri Route 291 ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  22:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC) (The interchanges are incomplete OK? Got it?)[reply]

Missouri Route 291

[edit]

Hi, I am itsrobloxhereyt I wanted to let the creator of Missouri Route 291 know that there are not enough interchanges on the intersections section. The missing ones are: I-470 west to US-50&MO-350. I-470 exit 11: Strother Road. I-470 exit 12: Wood Chapel Road. I-470 exit 14: Lakewood/Bowlin Boulevard/Road. I-470 exits 16A-16B-16C US 40&I-70 Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 21:31, 20 July 2020 (UTC) (not you imandzai)[reply]

Based on maps, MO 291 ends at I-435 and does not continue another 13.000 miles to the airport along Cookingham Drive. Please stop changing the article otherwise. Imzadi 1979  22:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 22:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox time. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 22:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Google maps is not always correct. For example in the Branson map, 465 is supposed to be part of 76. However, they have not updated it. 376 is supposed to go from 265 to Ozark Mountain Highroad, not 76 country Blvd. The Branson strip ( part of 76 country Blvd,) It is still marked 76. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 00:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Missouri Route 291, you may be blocked from editing. Imzadi 1979  22:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CoronaVirus?

[edit]

Masks Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 23:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MO-465 redirect

[edit]

Missouri Route 465 is being redirected to Missouri Route 76. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I've reverted this redirection without explanation, so please explain. Imzadi 1979  03:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no point in keeping this page up, this is a FORMER route. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FORMER routes have the option of being redirected to another page or keeping it up. I would just redirect the page instead. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is very much a point in keeping the article. We don't just delete articles on former highways. Otherwise, we wouldn't have a featured article on U.S. Route 16 in Michigan. I mean, we don't delete articles on people once they die.
It may be that we merge related highways to other articles, like we did with M-554 (Michigan highway), but you're not merging things. You're deleting the article by converting it into a redirect and then not putting that content, or a summary of it, someplace else. Imzadi 1979  03:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missouri Route 465 is NOW part of route 76, so it wouldn’t even matter now. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so you've redirected it for a third time. (Please revert yourself and follow WP:BRD as noted in the next section.) Now, where is all of the content about Route 465? Do you have any plans for it, or is Wikipedia going to have a hole in its coverage of the Missouri highway system? Imzadi 1979  03:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I might have plans for it, but the route is former Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content is back in its old page, but PLEASE note, that the route is former, and it may be taken down any day, but note, Content will be put in Missouri Route 76. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So what; it's a former highway. Big deal. M-108 (Michigan highway) is a former highway. It has an article. The fact that Route 465 is a former highway does not mean anything special. If you can't understand this, maybe you shouldn't be editing about former highways.
Now, M-126 (Michigan highway) may be something like what you eventually want to do. It's a former highway designation that was decommissioned when US 16 was realigned to replace it. Notice how M-126 is given its own browser in the main infobox. M-126 is also mentioned, in bold, in the article lead. It's also given its own infobox in the history of the US 16 article. In that history section, the years when M-126 was created and decommissioned are discussed. If there was more history to the highway, it would be included there as appropriate. If you look at https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=M-126_(Michigan_highway)&redirect=no you'll see that the redirect has been categorized properly as well. In short, you can't just delete an article on a former highway and not merge it. Imzadi 1979  03:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please note that per WP:USRD/STDS, the chain of articles created by the previous/next browsers at the bottom of the infobox includes former highways. M-125 (Michigan highway) points forward to M-126, and U.S. Route 127 in Michigan points back to M-126. The US 16 article has that extra browser line for M-126 to also point backwards and forwards to M-125 and US 127.
M-107 (Michigan highway), itself a former highway, points forward to M-108, and M-109 (Michigan highway) points backwards to M-108. M-108 points to both M-107 and M-109. This is just how it's done. Imzadi 1979  03:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You said route 365. It is 4 65. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The point is the same, and I've corrected the typo. Just to make it crystal clear, I'll repeat myself:
So what; it's a former highway. Big deal. M-108 (Michigan highway) is a former highway. It has an article. The fact that Route 465 is a former highway does not mean anything special. If you can't understand this, maybe you shouldn't be editing about former highways.
Imzadi 1979  03:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, we are all happy now, I figured it out, the page is back up and running. And no more redirects will happen. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 03:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Thanks for fixing the typo. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 04:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bold, Revert, Discuss

[edit]

Please read Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, also called WP:BRD. While the process is technically optional, it's a best practice. In short, if one of your edits is reverted, your best course of action is not to restore the edit in most cases. Imzadi 1979  03:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MO-750

[edit]

Route exists: maps.google.com Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 16:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Missouri Route 465. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As an US Route, Route 66 is formally retired. See the citation to Wikisource.

"Eliminate present U.S. Route 66 between the present beginning at Scotland, Missouri and the terminus at Sanders, Arizona."

The only existence of Route 66 is in the context of "Historical" or "Byway" of the previously signed route. It's existence as an official US route ended in 1985. --intelatitalk 17:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

[edit]

Itsrobloxhereyt, most of your edits have been unhelpful thus far. It doesn’t appear you understand the difference between federal and state highways, you’ve gotten into edit wars, you’ve blanked and reverted articles multiple times, and made disruptive edits to redirects. If you continue in this fashion it is likely you’ll end up blocked. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will try not to ever again. please accept. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 17:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube

[edit]

Subscribe., not begging, just do it. Itsrobloxhereyt (talk) 17:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Imzadi1979. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Interstate Highways in Missouri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  22:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 01:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Drmies (talk) 20:38, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Illinois Route 799

[edit]

Hello, Itsrobloxhereyt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Illinois Route 799".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Itsrobloxhereyt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:U.S. Route 110 in Missouri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itsrobloxhereyt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "U.S. Route 110 in Missouri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]