User talk:Its me 000

June 2019

You have been blocked’ indefinitely from editing for being a further sock puppet of a long-term abuser and or otherwise suspected to be evading a block or ban. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 'N.J.A. | talk 16:44, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Its me 000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello NJA, you know I'm only 11 and it is kind of rude to block a kid. Please unblock me now. I want you to show me what I have done wrong. If you do not, well, that basically means that you are a person who does not deserve to be an admin. I have been blocked for no reason. But I do remember once when I was like 7 or 8 I did indeed vandalise the Fullers Brewery page and remember, I was only 7 or 8 I did not know the consequences. I am older now, I understand what will happen, please I beg you. Pleeeease. Thank you. (Its me 000 (talk) 18:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ajay Narwe (ajju), where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]