Jump to content

User talk:ItsMeDigital

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ItsMeDigital (talk)

Stop this disruptive editing

[edit]

Your constant disruptive editing needs to stop immediately. You are constantly placing false information, contrary to what the references say into the article. That is obviously vandalism and putting false information into the article. Your aggressive reverts are even more disruptive, and your edit summaries are false as well.

I know what kind of editor you are. You were blocked twice already for disruptive editing and edit warring. You have even went as far as creating a sockpuppet in an attempt to prove your edits are right. You have also edit warred with other users just to prove your false point.

Stop putting false information on Wikipedia. This source only indicates 12/114 configuration exists. Your claim that the 8/whatever configuration exists is obviously false. According to this, only the 50/226, 28/336, and 32/330 configurations exist. Stop adding configurations that don't exist anymore, because false information is not allowed. Additionally, this excuse "these planes haven't entered service" needs to stop. Other editors have contested your edits. Most editors go by what they see on planespotters, so that is what they go by.

You have already been very disruptive. Your edits are false, and your excuses are even more false. I am asking you to stop purposely adding false information and stop being disruptive. Your aggressive editing tells me everything about you and is disruptive, and it needs to stop. ETI 15TrSF (Chat Box) 21:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If we're really going to go this way, I'll prove my edits are right to you. First let's talk about the 757, the premium configuration has been retired as mentioned on a webinar with United Execute Patrick Quayle (You've put the right in service number in but you brought back the configuration). Now on to the 777 configurations, since you say 'planespotters' is so reliable, the website shows that N219UA, N220UA, N221UA, and N77014 have the configurations I added back into the fleet article. Now to the 2 retired a320 units, N2910U, and N4912U have been sent to TUP for scrap. I've proved all my edits using all reliable sources including the one you mentioned yourself. You literally have shown to have no knowledge on the fleet and keep reverting my edits, thats the exact reason i've been 'blocked,' its because of editors like you who think are right but aren't. Next time you do your edits take a deep look into the source youre using. ItsMeDigital (talk) 05:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nice try on your excuse. I don't care if any aircraft still has the old configuration. How many seats in an aircraft is based on the official website, even though some have been unrefurbished yet. Your edits are WP:WEASEL and aren't needed. 3 other editors have contested your edits. That shows something that your edits are wrong. Also your statements about "to be converted to domestic configuration" blab blab blah are unsourced. Don't know where you get that from. The reason why you were blocked twice was not only because your edits are false, you were being very disruptive as well! ETI 15TrSF (Chat Box) 05:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]