Jump to content

User talk:Issac I Navarro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Montgomery High School (San Diego) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You cannot make unattributed, verbatim copies of material from the web. Meters (talk) 20:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me upon this matter Issac I Navarro (talk) 00:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would be the upmost thankful if you could help in regards where I could better fix my formatting to applied with Wikipedia, Such as articles that I would be able to see. Issac I Navarro (talk) 03:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Montgomery High School (San Diego), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please reference things properly. References go after the claim and the punctuation. Don't use non-reliable sources such as individuals' online posts, and don't use sources which don't actually support your claims. I'm getting tired of going over your edits. There are many problems aside from the referencing issues and the copyright issues. This is an encyclopedia, so write things neutrally. A school article is written to inform general readers about the school, it is not there to contain non-encyclopedic information. Meters (talk) 07:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, what may include non-encyclopedic information? For example, would information about how the school hosted an art festival fall under non-encyclopedic content, or would this apply to other matters such as graduation? I assume that if they were videos, they would be considered unreliable sources. Additionally, for information that is not publicly available, such as events covered in a yearbook, I would also assume that it would be considered self-published, thus making that information too biased to use, as it has not been verified by other sources.
I have not included details about how the school was the primary location for the 2023 Southern California VEX IQ Middle School State Championship or how it has been held where schools from far up North of San Diego has traveled down to Chula Vista to have it. I am wondering how this information might be sourced. Or if it would fall under non-encyclopedic?
Also, there is no information regarding the high school's logo. Sorry if this is a bit of a tangent, however. I did find information in regards to the logo. As it is commonly know the school's logo uses SDSU,.logo however do to controversy the collage has distance them self from that logo.. As seen here: https://www.cbs8.com/article/sports/ncaa/ncaab/where-is-san-diego-states-mascot/509-dd1bc44e-776f-463a-b99f-9b7f996044f5#:~:text=SDSU%20had%20a%20mascot%2C%20but,would%20no%20longer%20be%20used Also here https://president.sdsu.edu/priorities/aztec-identity/history#:~:text=For%20the%20first%20time%2C%20a,to%20become%20more%20historically%20accurate" For the first time, a student portrays an Aztec in a football game skit. The character becomes known as “Monty Montezuma.” Over time, the character's apparel is adjusted to become more historically accurate. May 12, 2023" When I started to look back at old message boards( that could be found here:https://aztecmesa.proboards.com/post/1132417/quote/38588) I found information from an admin saying that "Post by aron off on Jan 28, 2020 at 10:25am Classic Monty design - developed by Angelus Pacific Co in Fullerton and designed by Arthur Evans, their mascot designer - created specifically for Aztec Shops. Evans also drew the tough USC Trojan, Purdue Boilermaker, Oklahoma State cowboy, SEC schools, Oregon State beaver, and others all for college bookstores My copy of the artwork is dated 6/21/1940 as the date received by Aztec Shops" Thus it lead me to the https://www.sportsfevercal.com/ I went to a location in person and say that they did still sell the logo being used on the hat. I couldn't find any more information in regards to that logo, However going to an old revision on the Wikipedia article It mentioned that "Mike Brindle, 1975 - Artist who drew "Monty the Aztec" logo" however I couldn't find anything to verify that. The logo there may be the old high schools' logo witch could be found only at the high school it self; in classrooms, on the original basketball gym(the school has two) and could be found on yearbooks. That logo is more colorful. There is also another logo that the high school ASB used for the header of documents and check request forms. I am not sure the time period in witch this would of been however it seems around the 80s. Yet I can't find any information that it was ever used the only proof that the logo even exist is at the school in on those old papers. Because I have not found any information in who created the original logo, the one used by the ASB I have not added any information as I can't find any sources in regards to that.
So to end this rather long rant, I suppose that be that as it may, it seems that it may be easier if you provided some quick examples of what would be considered non-encyclopedic, such as what that may entail so I don't make that mistake again, as I am not completely sure what that may look like. Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palomar High School moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Palomar High School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I saw that there was not one created and it was on the Sweetwater Union High School District page, thus I figured on making one. Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palomar High School (October 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Issac I Navarro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 12 Monkeys (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I would like to clarify that the edits I made were primarily focused on a few specific lines. For instance, in line 44, there appears to be a discrepancy in the phrase, “He is interrogated by the scientists.” in the "He" as there is a space. However, upon reviewing my revisions, I see now that I inadvertently altered a quotation, in line 88. I apologize for this oversight, as I was utilizing the source editing during my editing process. Thank you. Issac I Navarro (talk) 17:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You also changed parts of the plot from present tense to past tense; I'm not sure why you did that, but if you intend to reinstate your edits, please be mindful of WP:PLOTTENSE. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 17:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamar Iveri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pie charts

[edit]

It isn't necessary to add pie charts to stub articles about schools. The charts are decorative, and too big to fit in the article. Just add the numbers. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Thumbs up icon
I have seen quite few being used on school related articles, that use the pie chart would it be acceptable to delete them? I was trying to find what Wikipedia's standards may be on the matter, however, I can't seem to find a clear standard could you refer me to a talk page or somewhere that outlines this policy? Regarding the use of pie charts in school-related articles; while pie charts are not explicitly prohibited or required by Wikipedia's standards, their inclusion must adhere to Wikipedia's general content guidelines: they should be relevant, neutral, and supported by verifiable sources. Thus, I was not sure where to look, Template:Pie chart but I could not find anything super clear in regards to school pages. Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look at WP:IMGCONTENT and MOS:IMAGES. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Mayorkas has been accepted

[edit]
Charlotte Mayorkas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahaml35 (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenna Daniels (November 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John M. McDevitt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Launch Virtual Academy (December 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiralwidget was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spiralwidget (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johnny Cash Trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asphalt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 13:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Brown Sr (December 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Issac I Navarro! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]