User talk:Isochrone/Archives/2022/February
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Isochrone. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Question from Jihan shan on File manager (13:09, 1 February 2022)
Selamat malam. Izin, sebelumnya nama saya Jihan Shan. Panggil saja Jihan. Saya ingin bertanya cara mengedit sebuah foto menjadi file pjg --Jihan shan (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 48
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
- 1Lib1Ref 2022
- Wikipedia Library notifications deployed
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamedsuppressin around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
Arbitration
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
tww
ready to proofread Thank you so much! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 03:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @つがる
Done — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 17:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
TheWikiWizard- Jan/Feb 2022
Hi, Berrely! Here is the first issue of 2022 for the TheWikiWizard!
Humor
- Since it's/was Lunar New Year, you can bug your boss at work for that extra fifty dollar bill ;)
- New Year, New world, Same TWW :P
- Did you work off that turkey? Don't worry, editing Wikipedia burns calories... I am pretty sure...
Wiki(p/m)edia News
- Check out The "Education/Eduwiki Week 2022"!
- Modussiccandi had a successful RFA!
- The 2022 Steward Elections are open to editors who meet the criterion.
Editor's Notes
- We are combining two months' issues into one, to try out a new format. This is the first issue of 2022. Happy New Year!
- That's it for this time, see you in the next issue!
- Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here
To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.
- Wishing you a good 2022! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- This issue was sent to you with the help of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 01:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
RedWarn 17
Hey! I noticed that in the sandbox for userwarnings, it says you used RedWarn 17, however to my knowledge you aren't part of the RedWarn team. Do admins get early access to new versions of RedWarn or are you on some kind of beta team? I'm not tryin to ask what's changed or new in RedWarn 17, I'm just a bit confused. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf: Berrely is part of the RedWarn team per WP:RW/TEAM. Chlod (say hi!) 14:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies I haven't made it clear, I am part of the RedWarn development team (I'll add the userbox in a minute, thanks Chlod). Currently, I'm just writing some documentation, so I needed to test the warnings :) — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 14:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ah ok. Didn't know that (the cowboy hat must work only on the actual RedWarn talk page). Thanks for explaining! I had honestly thought RedWarn 17 had released since it didn't appear as a sort of dev build (like what it looked like previously when you did it Chlod) but I checked the RedWarn talk page and it still said there is only minimal support for RW 16.1 while 17 is being worked on. Thanks for explaining! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Question from Extravirginooliveoil (21:44, 20 February 2022)
Why do I have a mentor --Extravirginooliveoil (talk) 21:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Extravirginooliveoil so I can proved help and support on editing Wikipedia, if you need it. Making personal attacks towards other contributors isn't a good start. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 06:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Deletion of content
How do you justify removal of photos from Wikipedia articles because you think they might have been taken without some kind of consent which might or might not have been required in some unspecified place(s)? We don't censor articles because somebody somewhere might somehow get offended. At a minimum, such removals should be discussed beforehand, and a clear rationale based on Wikipedia's own rules and principles must be offered and a consensus reached as to its application. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- The below is copied from what I was writing on the talk page of another article:
@Orangemike, you reverted my two edits where I removed photographs of minors likely taken without consent citing that it was "removal of sourced and attributed content". None of these images are sourced, and I think that, considering they are clearly taken without consent (I would also recommend looking at the Flickr URL of the English image) and can be better served by an extremely vast variety of equivalent images on Commons. Quite simply, these images are creepy and a possible violation of c:COM:PIP, I don't think that these serve any place in this article.I would be happy to discuss this on the talk page of the relevant articles. I believe these images are WP:GRATUITOUS, because there are equivalent images that can be used, such as the entire category of c:Category:School uniforms of the United Kingdom, though almost all of the Kogal images appear to have been taken in a public place, likely without consent. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 19:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)- If there are in fact equivalent images which meet your concerns, of course feel free to substitute them. Since the articles are about uniforms worn by minors, the person wearing them are generally going to be minors (or else fetishists), so I see no way around the "ooh, minors!" part of it. Personally, I find the idea of school uniforms authoritarian and inhuman, so I've never paid much heed to these articles; but I wish you'd consider starting a discussion on the talk pages before going on a deletion spree. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Orangemike, I will open a discussion about substituting the images on the relevant talk pages, apologies for not doing so prior. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 19:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- If there are in fact equivalent images which meet your concerns, of course feel free to substitute them. Since the articles are about uniforms worn by minors, the person wearing them are generally going to be minors (or else fetishists), so I see no way around the "ooh, minors!" part of it. Personally, I find the idea of school uniforms authoritarian and inhuman, so I've never paid much heed to these articles; but I wish you'd consider starting a discussion on the talk pages before going on a deletion spree. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)