User talk:Isochrone/Archives/2020/October
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Isochrone. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Benedict Carton page
I'm trying to clean up (or better, delete) the page I created for my colleague Benedict Carton. His work title is out of date, and the Isibaya reference is poorly sourced. Zschrag (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Zschrag, I think I may have inadvertently pressed my revert key. Apologies. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 18:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. The rules state that "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately," and I believe the Isibaya credit falls within that. I would be happy to see the page deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zschrag (talk • contribs) 18:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day!
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
- Ajpolino • LuK3
- Jackmcbarn
- Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
- There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Minecraft server
Template:Infobox Minecraft server has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
RW RfC close
Hiya. I appreciate I'm very late to the party on this but I'm curious about your close at Wikipedia_talk:RedWarn#RfC:_Dealing_with_abuse_of_RedWarn. Do you not feel as though you're WP:INVOLVED given you're part of the development team? I don't necessarily think it's a bad close (it would be hard to close it any other way, I think), but not sure I would have closed it in your position? Not a criticism in the slightest, but would be interested in your thoughts? Best, Darren-M talk 03:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- I honestly realised my mistake afterwards (albeit I was hardly involved at all in the development at that point) but I thought it was a waste of time after I closed it to reopen it again. I thought as long as I hadn't voted (which I hadn't), it would be appropriate to close it. If you believe the RfC should be reopened, I urge you to do so, and I apologise for my error. — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Berrely, Thanks, that makes sense. I can't see that it could have reasonably been closed another way so I don't think there's any value in reopening it. Best, Darren-M talk 11:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)