User talk:Isitjustslothwq

June 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Tinashe because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 09:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FMSky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chris Brown, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 11:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Isitjustslothwq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

isitjustslothwq (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Rename as it looks like a promotional account. Just wanted to clarify that its not and I don't mean it.

Decline reason:

That would be an acceptable new username. It looks like a promotional account because you were promoting a company. You made the 10 edits and waited the 4 days to be autoconfirmed to attempt to create the article about your business. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing. You won't be unblocked to further edit about your company at this time, so please tell what other edits you wish to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Isitjustslothwq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

isitjustslothwq (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Would like to make edits on kdrama related wiki-nevertheless,the witch's diner,Chae Jong-hyeop etc. and music related wiki

Decline reason:

One open unblock at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed your request for proper display. 331dot (talk) 09:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Isitjustslothwq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

isitjustslothwq (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Should I just wait for the username change approval now to continue editing in the future Name changing request pending and I get block from editing Wikipedia, How can I comment on the investigation below? Can someone please advice or share me some relevant guide? :(

Decline reason:

This does not appear to be an unblock request. It certainly doesn't address your inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may make your comments here. They may be standard, unformatted comments(not unblock requests) 331dot (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wqhiretual, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 13:07, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]