User talk:Isabel chn

Welcome!

Hello, Isabel chn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vikash Kumar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 11:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vikash Kumar

The article Vikash Kumar has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 11:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Vikash Kumar

I have nominated Vikash Kumar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikash Kumar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 05:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Vikash Kumar. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 07:17, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 09:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SpacemanSpiff 09:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated removal of AfD templates, blanking AfDs, socking - IP socking and user socking. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 10:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Microfinance Focus

As you know, there was consensus not to have an artcile at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microfinance Focus. I've deleted your repost because it did not substantially address the issues leading to deletion. If you disagree or want to pursue this topic because of new sources about the publication itself, I'd userfy it for improvement and later review. Further reposting, on the other hand would be disruptive.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]