User talk:Irshadpp
Welcome
[edit]
|
February 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Islam by country may have broken the syntax by modifying 40 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2020
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Mufti of India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 10:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- My edit was referenced, and your edit had reverted.--Irshadpp (talk) 10:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tablighi Jamaat, you may be blocked from editing. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 13:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Muftiship of Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, you may be blocked from editing. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 23:44, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Mufti of India. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 23:48, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Teamwork Barnstar | |
I ask you to be brave during the difficult times on Wikipedia. We have nothing to be afraid of as Muslims as long as we are respectful and tolerant of other religious groups within Sunni Islam. We are all required to follow Wikipedia rules and guidelines as we edit. You may leave a message on my Talk page, if you like. Cheers and Wassalaam Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
Vanity press
[edit]Lulu.com is a vanity press. This book is self-published and is not a reliable source for Wikipedia. Guy (help!) 10:46, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Welfare Party of India. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 13:24, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Authordom. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Grand Mufti of India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 11:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. You seem to be raising some good faith points and contributions but you may also be edging into to areas that are sensitive at a sensitive time, so please take care. Thankyou
Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. You seem to be raising some good faith points and contributions but you may also be edging into to areas that are sensitive at a sensitive time, so please take care. Thankyou
Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
When you remove a citation to a source from an article, could you please replace all the citations to that source with the {{fact}} tag? For an example, see this diff: [1]. Otherwise, all of these assertions will remain unchallenged in the article, which may be the reverse of what you seek to achieve. -- The Anome (talk) 10:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Welfare Party of India. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 09:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Muhammad (Karakunnu), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In this edit summary, you wrote "Ask for citation, not to remove instantly". Please note that per WP:ONUS - the responsibility is on you to provide the citations, not the other way around. Hence, the content that you have added -- without citations -- has been removed. —MelbourneStar☆talk 11:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tipu Sultan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
empty footnote on Ali Musliyar
[edit]Hi, Irshadpp! I noticed in this edit you added an empty footnote {{efn|name=birth}}
. I removed it, but wanted to reach out in case there was something you meant to include in the footnote.
Let me know if I can be of assistance! = paul2520 (talk) 01:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Paul2520, Thanks.--Irshadpp (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Apologies
[edit]For some reason I thought you had edit warred on the short description ... I hink I had an old browser section open and didn't check. Pleae accept my apologies. I got edit warred this morning on another article and probably a bit sensitive. I need to take an edit break, at least from more sensititive stuff. Again please accept my apologies. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Tipu Sultan Dispute Resolution
[edit]Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
[edit]This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Edithgoche (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)