User talk:Ironlad99

May 2013

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Preston North End F.C. that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, ... discospinster _talk 21:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Preston North End F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deepdale, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Soham. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Deepdale because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Soham 14:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Soham, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Flat Out let's discuss it 14:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deepdale, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flat Out let's discuss it 14:41, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as User talk:Soham are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 14:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:52, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:05, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ironlad99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am truly sorry for the disruptive nature of my edits.

Decline reason:

Apologies, though welcome, are not required, and are not sufficient reason for unblocking your account. Please read the guide to appeals to see what is required before you can be unblocked. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ironlad99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am truly sorry for the disruptive nature of my edits. My actions did not comply with Wikipedia's policy, and I will make sure I will not carry out unconstructive and vandalising edits Ironlad99 (talk) 6:08 am, Today (UTC−6)

Accept reason:

Unblocking per blocking admin's assent. - Vianello (Talk) 22:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]