User talk:Irobotboy

Irobotboy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Irobotboy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Mass Rapid Transit Page

Hi, the correct number of stations is 106. Please go and count on the system map. Interchange stations count as ONE station and you can't just add the numbers up to get 125. 33ryantan (talk) 00:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Mz7. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lee's Family Reunion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lee's Family Reunion, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.68.199.203 (talk) 12:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

North South and East West Line edits

Hi,

Thanks for your edits, but the information you provided is already present in the "Overview" section of the two articles. For the rolling stock, it is understood that the trains that ply the East West Line also plies the NSL. If a user needs more info, he/she can check out the respective rolling stock articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guysayshi (talk • contribs) 12:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 13:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Woodlands South MRT Station. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 08:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manners

Please watch your manners. This is childish and discourteous; if you cannot do better, you will not last long here. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Gul Circle MRT station

Hi, For your edits to Gul Circle MRT Station, could you please at least verify your information with a reliable source? I am unable to find any evidence supporting your information. R22-3877 (talk) 05:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gul Circle MRT Station. --David Biddulph (talk) 06:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to My Teacher Is A Thug

Hi, Just to let you know that after the local series drama My Teacher Is A Thug the next drama is Woman Of Dignity. You can go to instagram or List of Mediacorp Dramas 2014 for confirmation. Thanks! If not you will be blocked for disruptive editing. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia

"out of system transfer" edits

Hi Irobotboy,

Your edits regarding out-of-system transfers to other lines are not necessary as they are too excessively detailed for Wikipedia articles. These contributions will make the MRT articles seem more like a traveller's guide.

Also, I am entirely aware that some of the Downtown Line interchange station transit areas are "public" and not "paid". These include Newton station, Tampines station and Bukit Panjang station. I know these info like the back of my hand, and I'm sure you do too. But they make the articles too complicated. The articles should be concise and not confusing; it should provide more essential information and less trivial information.

Hope this clarifies. Guysayshi (talk) 21:07, 11 October 2017

Just saying, maybe we should migrate and start editing land transport guru? Anyway as guysayshi said Wikipedia is a Encyclopedia and not a traveler guide. If you want to edit travel guides, go to LTG. I understand that we all know about every nook and cranny in the MRT, but please refrain from adding these unimportant info. It is a bit annoying to check my watchlist and see you bulk edit and then someone reverts everything. Stuff such as "unpaid linkway" or "out of system transfer" is unnecessary as foreigners would not check Wikipedia for travel info and locals would already know this. As for the station code, I am rather neutral on it and I would let guysayshi settle it with you. - 1.02 editor (talk) 13:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Station colour codes

Hello. I note your interest in editing the MRT articles and appreciate it.

Please do not however, that Wikipedia articles do not usually feature colours in text or tables. As such, please stop adding the colour codes back into the pages. If you wish to consult me on details, please do feel free to reply.

You may also refer to articles from the London Underground and Beijing Subway for more understanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.56.102.223 (talk) 09:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please refer to the discussion here. If we still disagree on the style of the line maps, I will refer it to an administrator for mediation.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:1.02_editor

I do intend to remove all the coloured codes from all the line pages, except for individual stations, so I hope you can contribute to the discussion there. Seloloving (talk) 12:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Irobotboy, please do not undo the changes made by other Wikipedians without a reason. Constructive editing which aids both users is preferred, the pages do not belong to you alone. It can lead to misunderstandings and an edit war. I have also referred the matter to an administrator, you may put your points across there.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:There%27sNoTime#Formatting_of_Pages_of_Singapore_MRT_Lines

Please do join in the conversation. Seloloving (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kaki Bukit MRT Station, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 13:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop moving unreferenced drafts into the mainspace after a New Page Patroller has moved them to draftspace. You've repeatedly done this, without any edit summary or attempts to rectify the issues. You have had many messages from concerned editors; please heed them. It may be worth you looking at WP:V. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to the above message; WP:Communication is required. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:49, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

Please be aware that editing while logged out [1] is a concern, such as at [2] where you used it to remove an unreferenced tag on an unreferenced page, with no edit summary given. Please see WP:SCRUTINY. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Irobotboy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello, Irobotboy, could you please start using edit summaries? It saves other editors a lot of time. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irobotboy, can you please use edit summaries? It makes it much easier for other editors. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dhoby Ghaut MRT Station, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Stewartsoda (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove templates as you did in this edit. As was pointed out in the previous section, you ought to be using edit summaries to explain your edits. Please do so. --David Biddulph (talk) 01:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Life Less Ordinary (TV series). --David Biddulph (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Communication

Irobotboy, responding to messages when other editors raise concerns is not optional. WP:Communication is required and is an essential component of WP:CONDUCT. Please respond to the messages I have sent, and prefereably, reply to the many messages sent by others. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have blocked your account indefinitely as you are refusing to address or even reply to the many messages and warnings you've received. If you wish to edit here, you can start by communicating with us. Thanks, Swarm ♠ 23:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]