User talk:Iraqisantur

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Iraqi Santur. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. We are working to build a better encyclopedia. Please assume good faith. This is with respect to your edit comments in the Iraqi Santur article on 2011-11-07. "Vandalism" in Wikipedia has a very specific meaning; you should be careful not to conflate editing you don't like with vandalism. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC) N2e (talk) 13:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 4 giving

Hello Ms IraqiSantur,

Congratulations on your page of mis-information. I told you a few times I can help you make the Iraqi page technically & historically correct.

and you have blown me off.

time to swallow your pride.

Just a little info: User N2e is a Senior Editor at Wikipedia

You might NOT want to call him names and accuse him of vandalizing, that's a really dumb thing to do.

You should NOT talk like that to anyone.

Again I don't care what you do on your page. But a little advice: Using a children's book of music is NOT a real reference.

They are asking for PAGE NUMBERS. Which means you have to actually read the book and find a page that you are using a reference.

Stop arguing and fighting with people. It's RUDE and really pointless.

This is an ENCYCLOPEDIA - Please do a dictionary search on what that word means.

it does NOT mean start a war with anyone else who tries to correct your mistakes or asks you for REAL PROOF

You will end up getting banned if you keep acting like that. You did the same thing with me on Santur.

Show me one NOTABLE Iraqi Santur player. Do you know what NOTABLE means?

It means accomplished, world famous musicians.

I play Santur almost as good as my father. & I don't even put my own name on the Santur page.

You know why? Because I have NOT accomplished 10% of what my father has.

And I don't have pride. I perform Santur with Prince, Killers, Black Eyed Peas and American mainstream music.

I don't need my name on that page.

I put people who spent their entire lives contributing to the world of Santur and that's all they do.

You can NOT remove "Citation Needed" tags that Wikipedia Editors place on your page.

when they do that, you have to reference BETTER and more ACCURATE DETAILED REFERENCES.

And now that you have found 3 books that have ISBN numbers, you think you have done your job. it's bullshit.

Trying to remove the Tag will only bring it back and cause Wiki Editors to get annoyed with your editing.

I just came back from the Ethnomusicology Conference in Philadelphia.

I met a variety of professors and master musicians who are Arabic.

They are going to come to the Iraqi Santur page and help you fix it.

Don't start fighting with them and changing their information.

I told them the story and asked them to help.

I also printed my page and yours to show them and they laughed.

They told me to tell you that there was no Home Depot in Mesopotamia :)

You will appreciate there input and they have a right to be on here as everyone does.

Just cause you created the page, doesn't mean you own it or are the police of that page. I told you that before.

EVERYONE HAS A RIGHT TO INPUT REAL INFORMATION ON HERE.

AND FROM READING YOUR INFORMATION: YOU ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT A SANTUR PLAYER, YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IRAQI MUSIC OR THE IRAQI SANTUR AND YOU PROBABLY DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT MUSIC.

AND YOU HATE IRANIANS FROM YOUR COMMENTS.

But you pulled off doing something for your culture, which is why you care probably and I admire that.

I'm just as proud of my culture.

But I don't go on the Piano page and start crapping on people who edit on the Piano page.

For the same reason: After our last argument, I haven't touched the Iraqi Santur page, even though I can point out a lot of errors and incorrect information.

Do you even know what Chromatic means? THE IRAQI SANTUR IS NOT CHROMATIC. THE ONLY SANTUR THAT IS FULLY CHROMATIC IS: DULCIMERS & CYMBALLUMS

Your English is also very poor and you should let someone who is qualified to re-write your page with proper english.

please don't take anything I said personally. THIS IS NOT AN INVITATION TO ANOTHER FIGHT.

I've tried repeatedly to talk to you and communicate but you continue to ignore

so I'm just going to come on here and let you know: what you need to know.

you can take it or leave it. that's your business.

I was informed by Wikipedia if I have a problem with someone to use the "Talk" button to communicate, so I'm following the rules peacefully.

Either way, Happy Thanksgiving & I sincerely hope you have a happy holiday.

I hope one day: You reply nicely one time to start a real dialogue and move forward gaining a friend.

I don't need anything from you. So you have nothing to lose and a lot to gain.

Who do think makes a better Kabob? Persian's or Iraqi's ?? lol understand? we're all the same.

peace — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santurman (talk • contribs) 07:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Iraqisantur! Your additions to Draft:Nailute have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nailute

Hello, Iraqisantur. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nailute, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nailute

Hello, Iraqisantur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nailute".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Arabs and Etymology of Arab, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Wikipedia article is not a place for you to lodge your personal disputes with the information in an article. Use the talk page to raise any disagreement. In addition, if you disagree with content that is supported by cited sources, then you need to supply reliable sources to support your view. "I disagree with this" is insufficient grounds for adding contrary content to an article or removing existing sourced content. Largoplazo (talk) 17:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]