User talk:Iranianbio

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your recent item has been reurned to Draft:Bee Ghanoon (film). Please do not continue to move items to mainspace without allowing the review process to complete. You have received notifications about this issue in the recent past and deleting messages from your talk page is typically taken to mean that you have read them (and therefore are aware of their content). If you continue in this disruptive manner, ultimately it may lead to the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 13:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmoud Maghami moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mahmoud Maghami, is not suitable as written to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 13:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Do not return articles. I did not enter these in the article space. These were entered by the AFC--Iranianbio (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

{{please unblock me | Hello, good day, I created an article and a user entered it (Draft Box), I did not cause any inconvenience and I intend to create valid Iranian articles, I did not have any inconvenience to the user and I do not have and a user named (Nellini It bothered me in all my articles. I just told him that you are hostile and that this is not right. You better help me, in any case, please see my articles and edits. I revived those who were in danger of being eliminated

"Born" is the instant a child comes out of the mother. It does not mean the whole time a person is alive. Therefore "born 1954–" is incorect ("born 1954" is correct) and "born 1954–2004" is also incorrect (just "1954–2004" is correct). Please remember to use edit summaries so other editors can understand what you are doing and help proof-read and advise about possible improvements. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DMacks Hello, thank you for your help, I will fix the problems--Iranianbio (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! DMacks (talk) 15:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add machine translations

In Davoud Rashidi you added quite a lot of text that was so poorly written that it was difficult to understand it. It looked very much like a machine translation. Please do not add any text to Wikipedia if it has been machine translated and not thoroughly revised and edited.

If you are not able to write article text or talk page comments in English without using machine translations, it would be a good idea for you to contribute to Farsi Wikipedia instead. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Davoud Rashidi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added all the sources to this article, this article had no connection, all the sources I added are valid, for example, I added Hamshahri newspaper, which is the most authoritative Iranian newspaper, it is a government newspaper, and also several news agencies that are among the main news and They are the government of Iran.The validity of an Iranian news can be better understood by an Iranian Wikipedia because our language is Persian،Your removal has been useless. Please pay more attention before deleting,By the way, I was a Wikipedia user fourteen years ago and I know the rules of Wikipedia. Unfortunately, I forgot my previous username and email. That's why I created this username. Iranianbio (talk) 10:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Davoud Rashidi, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 11:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 20:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bee Ghanoon (film) (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are six sources:

no 1 is a brief blurb about the film on the producer's website
no 2 is a press release about a TV show, which doesn't mention this film
no 3 is a brief notice on a news website, based on a press release about the production
no 4 is the main page of the producer's website
no 5 is the main page of the news website that published source 3
no 5 is a promotional text on the producer's website.

In other words, three of the sources don't mention the film at all, and of the other three, none is independent and none is secondary.

If the movie has won awards, there has to be some independent verification and some information about which awards it won.

The draft has been created by a user with a direct connection to the producer (as can be seen in source 1), without any disclosure.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bee Ghanoon (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bee Ghanoon (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iranianbio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Iranianbio. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmoud Maghami moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mahmoud Maghami, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). It also needs a thorough revision to make the language possible to understand. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 20:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

bonadea You are looking for a war, the article has entered the main space and remains there. You do not have the right to delete it. You can apply to be nominated to delete the article. the article is completely correct in terms of links and writing, you are not an administrator, even administrators do not move the article and only request to be nominated for deletion--Iranianbio (talk) 20:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bi Ghanoon poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bi Ghanoon poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing and egregious personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 08:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iranianbio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Hope you feel good, I created an article and a user entered it (Draft Box), I did not cause any inconvenience and I intend to create valid Iranian articles, I did not have any inconvenience to the user and I do not have and a user named "bonadea" It bothered me in all my articles. I just told him that you are hostile and that this is not right. You better help me, in any case, please see my articles and edits. I revived those who were in danger of being eliminated،my intention is to improve iranian articles because they often have problems such as writing format and most of them do not have proper links.In any case, I apologize if I made a mistake.--Iranianbio (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Daniel Case hi, thank you for your help, i thought this request was rejected, so i wrote another one .--Iranianbio (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to admins. This apology message is very similar to this account/edit [1] and has been editing with other socks on List of Iranian actresses, List of Iranian male actors and List of Iranian musicians. 180.0.123.50 (talk) 08:53, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection to the user you wrote, pleaseع check my edits, IP and isp,it should also be noted that most iranian wikipedia writers use (google translate) and their writing format may be somewhat similar.--Iranianbio (talk) 09:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For recent personal attacks, see these posts. For disruptive editing, see the repeated moves of Mahmoud Maghami and Bee Ghanoon (film) from draft to mainspace in the teeth of rejections at AfC (this is what the user is scolding Bonadea about in the previous diffs). As far as "no connection" to other users, maybe. Iranianbio is currently listed at WP:SPI, here. Bishonen | tålk 11:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Iranianbio, I gave a clear rationale for my block, or so I thought. It wasn't for anything to do with socking, but for "persistent disruptive editing and egregious personal attacks". It seems kind of pointless to keep posting unblock requests about something I did not block you for. Why don't you address the reasons I actually gave? Feel free to change your unblock request. And wait for one request to be replied to by an uninvolved admin before posting another! You currently have three open requests. I advise you to remove them and post one request, and try to make it thoughtful and relevant. Bishonen | tålk 21:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

User:Bishonen Definitely. Thank you for your help, if I offended you, forgive me--Iranianbio (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iranianbio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I hope you are well. I was accused of socks while I only have the same username and I did not make a mistake in this case, please check my IP and ISP as well as my edits,but I made a mistake and argued a bit with another user :user:bonadea who wanted to help me, but I did not insult and just thought he was hostile to me, in any case I made a mistake and I ask more experienced users to help me ،Even high-level Wikipedia users made mistakes early on,maybe i also reached a high level one day with your help,i apologize for arguing with user:bonadea and i will not repeat it again and i also try to write my articles more carefully if forgiven.i hope you forgive me.of course, make any decision, and even if i am not forgiven, your decision is respectable. note: 1,due to the fact that most iranian users use (google translate) in wikipedia,they may have a similar writing format. please note that i did not write any malicious articles or malicious edits. or i did not enter incorrect information in wikipedia and only edited about iranian articles. most iranian articles have problems in written format as well as links, and if they are not fixed, unfortunately they will be deleted. i added articles or corrected the wrong format of some articles. please pay attention to my edits. 2,Regarding the accusation of socks, according to a research I did, only one of my articles, which was a popular Iranian series "special love line" was made by a blocked user before me. I did not know about this issue.i made 1,200 edits, i do not think that making an article previously made by an unauthorized user is the reason why i am a socks.finally, i ask the reviewer to review me based on all my conversations, ip, isp as well as my edits, and i welcome that. but it is not fair for me to be wrongly charged with other charges. --Iranianbio (talk) 21:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As mentioned above the block was for disruptive editing and personal attacks, including issues to do with sourcing, notability and poor collaboration. But as you have mentioned multiple accounts ("sockpuppets"), there is also a reasonable body of evidence linking this account with Hoseinkandovan. This is in both content and editing style, and is not explicable simply by referring to machine translation. I'd invite you to submit a new unblock request with your understanding of sourcing and notability, and something a lot more convincing re the similarity with this blocked sockpuppet. If this can't be done that's fine, but this account will likely stay blocked. -- Euryalus (talk) 00:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.