User talk:Ira1942

Welcome!

Hello, Ira1942, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference Errors on 28 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Joe Glaser page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ira blacker

The article Ira blacker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. McGeddon (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements needed at Draft:Ira Blacker

Hello, you're almost but not quite getting how to do references. Right now you have your references formatted as footnotes (which is good) but instead of being placed by the information in the article that they prove the little blue numbers are just stacked at the bottom of the article. Take a glance at WP:Referencing for beginners and it shows how to fix this.

Also, I see you have a lot of GoogleBooks references (which is good). There's a really helpful online tool to turn a URL link ("http://...") into a fully-formatted Wikpedia footnote. Take any of those links, paste it into http://reftag.appspot.com and at the bottom it'll give you properly formatted footnote coding to paste into your article. Hope this helps! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reftag only works on gBooks, so that's fine for now. If you want to automatically fix the other links with an easy click, paste the name of your article (including the "Draft:" prefix but noting before that) into this tool: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fengtools/reflinks/

What you need to do next is:

Remove any footnotes to other Wikipedia articles. You can WP:wikilink to other WP articles (the blue clickable links) but you cannot cite them, footnote them, etc. That would be circular logic, citing Wikipedia on itself.
The next part is that you're formatting footnotes right, but you're not placing them right. Again, please take a glance at WP:Referencing for beginners. If I say "John Smith invented an apple-picker in 1973.^[1]", it should have a little blue number right after that claim, and that blue number matches up with the citation at the bottom automatically for you. The problem is that you stacked all your little blue numbers at the very end of the article, not actually next to the facts they support, so we have no idea what supports what.

Example of References section, automatically sorts the little blue numbers above

^ History of Apples. Acme Press, 1974. Pg 93

Fix those for now and we'll be in a much better position to move forward. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MV helpdesk reply

Hello, Ira1942. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#20:01:02.2C_23_January_2015_review_of_submission_by_Ira1942.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ira Blacker (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CraigyDavi was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ira Blacker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—CraigyDavi (T∙C∙@) 23:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The helpchat

Hello Ira1942. My name is Howicus. I assume that you were the person who came into #Wikipedia-en-help ^connect earlier today asking about Draft:Ira Blacker. Unfortunately, when you copy/pasted your references into the channel, the automated anti-spam program saw that as posting too many messages too quickly, and it kicked you out of the channel. The ban has been lifted though, and you should be able to re-join the channel now if you like.

Now, in regards to your question, one thing you should do is turn your references into inline citations, so that it's easy to tell what information in the article is from which sources. The actual format of the sources looks fine...you just need to move them into the body of the article. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ira Blacker (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ira Blacker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ira1942, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ira Blacker

Hello, Ira1942. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ira Blacker".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] History of Apples. Acme Press, 1974. Pg 93

[1]