User talk:Ioscrivo

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello.

Yesterday I completed an article on fleecehold and then pressed the "publish" button.

Today I have searched for fleecehold in the Wikipedia search box but it still says there is no page in Wikipedia on fleecehold.

I expect the page I created yesterday may be in a queue for assessment and then, hopefully, approval, but I would be grateful if current status of the article could be checked, to ensure that all is in order, and if I could be given an idea of when the page may appear on Wikipedia.

Thank you.

Ioscrivo Ioscrivo (talk) 12:44, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still in your user sandbox. If you wish to have the article reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia, please add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. If you have any additional questions, feel free to ask them here. Sario528 (talk) 13:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Sario528, thank you for advising that I need to add {{AFC submission|||ts=20190404133638|u=Ioscrivo|ns=3}} to the top of the page in order for it to be put forward for publication.

Just before finding your answer to my question, I found a Wikipedia page advising that for the page to be published four days must pass since I created my account, and that within those four days I must make 10 edits elsewhere in Wikipedia. So I have just added a detail to the Wikipedia page on Shrewsbury, and will look for 9 other improvements I can make on other pages.

But could you, please, confirm that these 10 edits are necessary before the page I have submitted may be published?

And if it IS necessary that I make 10 edits, perhaps it would be beneficial if I could help improve pages which you KNOW are in need of improvement. (I have a postgraduate degree in linguistics, so I could help perfect pages on which you know the English grammar or expression needs improvement.)

Thank you.

Ioscrivo (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you will notice below, that while your submission was not accepted, it was not because you don't have enough edits. Do you remember where you found that requirement? EDIT: Also, you do not need to keep using the help me, as I have watchlisted this page and will be monitoring it for responses. Sario528 (talk) 13:51, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sario528 (talk), thank you for the prompt response.

I could go through the article and strip away everything and anything that cannot be substantiated by a reference to a secondary source, in the hope that that would certainly make the content acceptable.

But, just in case, would it be possible for a Wikipedia editor to go through the article and run "a highlighter" over phrases or sentences which must be changed, substantiated by a secondary source, or deleted? (A different colour for each kind of issue would be helpful.)

I've already put a month's work into the article, seeking to be neutral and to substantiate each matter, though certainly not every sentence, and I am too busy with my own work to become a Wikipedia editor, so I would much rather not have to "re-invent the wheel" for this one-off contribution.

In other words, is there another way?

Re. the 10 edits, I found the information in the "This page in a nutshell" box at the top of: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_first_article

Thank you.

Ioscrivo (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also see WP:NOR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ioscrivo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ioscrivo/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ioscrivo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fleecehold (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fleecehold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fleecehold, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 21:42, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fleecehold concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fleecehold, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]