User talk:Introductory adverb clause

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great job!

By the way, you should also warn vandals using: (without the nowiki tags)

{{subst:uw-v1}} ~~~~ {{subst:uw-v2}} ~~~~ {{subst:uw-v3}} ~~~~ {{subst:uw-v4}} ~~~~

If they vandalize after uw-v4, go here. Happy vandal fighting! JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strange question, but...

Hello, you aren't a bot, are you? JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 04:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC) No[reply]

December 2007

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Alice Academy: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Chetblong^Talk_Sign 04:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Introductory adverb clause! I am Chetblong, and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Chetblong^Talk_Sign 04:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Rule of law: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Jauerback (talk) 20:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Adele Stephens has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Mdebets (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DNFT

Hello, Introductory adverb clause. I appreciate your anti-vandal work, but please do not leave messages like this on talk pages of vandals. This might only encourage them to continue trolling to see if they can get an even stronger reaction. It is best to react as formal (and preferably, as little) as possible to their actions. In other words: DNFT! Again: keep up your vandal reverting! Cheers, Face 20:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]