User talk:Intforce/Archive 2022

Your GA nomination of Piano Quartet (Strauss)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piano Quartet (Strauss) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 16:01, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piano Quartet (Strauss)

The article Piano Quartet (Strauss) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Piano Quartet (Strauss) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 09:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piano Quartet (Strauss)

The article Piano Quartet (Strauss) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Piano Quartet (Strauss) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Potential Superpower page edits

I've been observing that you are erasing the information provided by me, as well as constantly undoing my edits without proper clarification. The edits made by me were previously made by consensus among many editors, I'm just following their lead. Also I've previously clarified that since China & European Union wields far more influence than India & Russia, their classification is above India & Russia, hence the term emerging, also superpower & hyper power are different classifications, a power that dominates in all fields unconstrained, without consequences is hyperpower, which US was, but is no longer, & can be considered extant superpower. Also I'd like to let you know that I'm new to wikipedia editing, & don't use registered account, as there's no wikipedia policy mentioning unregistered users cannot make edits. I would appreciate that you stop constant undoing of my edits. Regards.

Your edits are not, in any sense, based on consensus; on the contrary, they are uncited and violate NPOV. On the article's talk page, another editor (Subtropical-man) has questioned and reverted your edits. Per WP:BRD, if you find your changes reverted because of disagreement, you do not start edit warring to get your changes included: this will lead to a block. You have made no attempt to resolve these issues by debate on the talk page. There is no policy against unregistered users, but you are repeatedly violating policies that all users are subject to, registered or not. intforce (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I'll edit that part only after consensus, however why did you erase the McKinsey report's information ? Also it seems you had word war with User Fijipedia, over my reverts, I've clarified it in his talk page. As mentioned there, I'll erase the 2021 Asia power index report, as it's already mentioned below in China segment.

Thanks for letting me know on the potential superpower page... I misread the renewed proposal where the move title idea was squeezed in beyond the original proposal (both in OP's reflection on their own idea at the top and now in the conclusion). I updated my response and added a line. (ps I added this notification here to avoid adding more topic to your talk, hope that is ok with you) Best Arnoutf (talk) 13:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Open Science denier?

So I'm adding factual information to the University of Zürich website about open science and the universities' activities in this area. And you are removing it saying it is not appropriate. What's up? I have linked to sources where possible, and I'm sure that others can improve on this.

Science is facing a global crisis and universities are responding in various ways and the UZH has taken steps in this direction. Your power to revert my changes is exercised without justification. This does not seem right. Nbreznau (talk) 17:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

I have replied on the article's talk page. intforce (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

rationale on revert

in Requiem (Mozart), previous changes have been removed. what is the rationale of this decision? your change have been reverted until this is explained. thank you for your understanding. --Christophe.moustier (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

@Christophe.moustier: I have explained my reversion in the edit summary: as a user-generated site, Ultimate-guitar is not a reliable source. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. The edit as a whole was also ill-formatted. We don't put up lyrics and chord symbols like that. In my opinion, it is also a statement of trivia that is not notable to the article as a whole. If you wish to include this, discuss on Talk:Requiem (Mozart) first. The onus is on you to gain consensus before adding it, now that it has been reverted, see WP:BRD. intforce (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Quit being rude!!

bro - you're not the owner of all wiki pages related to classical music. Quit removing my and other people's contributions. Gqayala (talk) 17:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

@Gqayala: I suggest you familiarize yourself on the Wikipedia policies on edit warring. If you wish to discuss, open a discussion on the article's talk page. intforce (talk) 18:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

How do you get the excerpts of music?

Hi, Intforce. What is your process for obtaining music excerpts such as in the featured article Piano Sonata No. 31 (Beethoven)? examples --> (diffs: [1] [2] [3][4]) I think the article Piano_Concerto No. 5 (Beethoven) needs those kinds of pictures too. Are you using the process from Help:Sibelius? Thanks YourJudge (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

I use Dorico to engrave short excerpts; it also supports SVG files. intforce (talk) 09:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited XVIII International Chopin Piano Competition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Liu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Technical University of Munich people

A tag has been placed on Category:Technical University of Munich people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)