User talk:Interstate Good

You can talk to me, in case I need to fix something.

Being A Good Person

So, don’t ban me I’m a good person, okay? Interstate Good (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. You are not an administrator. Do not threaten to block other editors, as you did here. Anyone can edit the Sandbox for (almost) any reason. There is a very limited scope in what is not allowed to be posted to the Sandbox. GSK (talk • edits) 04:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know Interstate Good (talk) 04:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Friend

What happened Interstate Good? Interstate Best (talk) 21:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got a message from GSK because I edited something Interstate Good (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s okay Interstate Best (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s make my user page together! Interstate Best (talk) 21:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Plan! Interstate Good (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you pretending to be separate accounts? Are you aware of WP:SOCK?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No Interstate Good (talk) 22:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How did you know? Interstate Good (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stick to one account please.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but it was my friend Interstate Best. I’m sorry. Interstate Good (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You logged out of this account to create the Interstate Best account. Both accounts will be blocked if you don't knock it off.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I’m sorry Interstate Good (talk) 22:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And what about User:Helpmeokay? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 00:18, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is happening to my talk page? Interstate Good (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We're asking about potential alternate accounts. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 00:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is too many replies Interstate Good (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you're unable to answer basic questions about you and alternate accounts you are suspected of creating, I wonder if editing an encyclopedia is ultimately a good choice for you. GSK (talk • edits) 00:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That’s enough replies because this is too many replies Interstate Good (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Ingenuity (t • c) 13:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was busy Interstate Good (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So please unblock me Interstate Good (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that I was busy so please unblock me I’m sorry Interstate Good (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interstate Good (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was busy, sorry about that, next time don’t block me

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interstate Good (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was grounds but, I was following the rules and I will make a encyclopedia. I’m a good person. I won’t violate the rules okay?

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 20:36, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also I was asleep while you blocked me so, don’t block me. I apologize. Interstate Good (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, I didn’t do anything, I will build an encyclopedia. Interstate Good (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn’t sockpuppetry I was a good person Interstate Good (talk) 20:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So please unblock me Interstate Good (talk) 20:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help me😢 Interstate Good (talk) 20:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interstate Good (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m very sorry for doing that. So, I won’t do anything bad again, okay? So I will only go to one account (Interstate Good). Also can you delete my accounts I made except for Interstate Good’s account, okay? I promise I won’t sockpuppetry again because, I’m a good person and I’m not a bad editor and I help people to fix something. So don’t worry, so please, unblock me. I won’t do bad things again, okay? Interstate Good (talk) 22:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The sockpuppetry was only one aspect of the block; you have almost no constructive edits to this encyclopedia. Please describe the edits you wish to make, including at least one specific example of a substantive edit(more than fixing spelling or grammar). 331dot (talk) 06:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Interstate Good (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So this is my last unblock request, I will make good edits in the future and I don’t want be blocked forever because I will make helpful edits in the future and that’s all. If you accept this request I will make helpful edits in English Wikipedia but if you decline this request I will give up English Wikipedia and head to Simple English Wikipedia. And I learned my lesson.

Decline reason:

I don't believe that unblocking your account would benefit the encyclopedia at this time. If you prove yourself to be productive, long-term, on simple.wiki (where you note you intend to edit), then you can appeal via WP:UTRS. Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:51, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You know, there's at least a chance you might get an unblock at some point if you directly answered the questions that other editors have been giving you. In the unblock decline, 331dot gave you concrete things you could do that might lead to you maybe being unblocked, such as describing specific substantive edits that you intend to make. Yet, you completely ignored that excellent advice and just posted the same unconvincing unblock request. Why would people expect you to make helpful edits in the future if you won't directly answer a single question? CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s already about 3 days and they didn’t reviewed yet. Interstate Good (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Point proved. Talk page access revoked; this is going nowhere. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.