User talk:InterComMan

Welcome!

Hi InterComMan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 08:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonima italiana petroli‎

Hi! I see you've re-added a speedy deletion tag to Anonima italiana petroli‎. Did you read my previous decline reason, "decline WP:R3, definitely a plausible redirect (see e.g., Corriere della Sera, https://www.corriere.it/economia/17_novembre_03/api-ip-rete-made-italy-compra-tutte-stazioni-total-erg-d21a9dec-c0e3-11e7-8b75-0df914d10fe2.shtml"? Because the briefest internet search shows that this name is in fact used in reliable sources, so there's no reason to delete it. We commonly have redirects from mis-spelt or mistaken titles to the correct one, a few extra redirects do no harm to the project. Would you please remove the tag? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about the last bit, it's already been done. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see the article because the magazine is paid for. Anyway it's a wrong name and an orphaned redirect, what's the point of keeping it? InterComMan (talk) 09:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, please see this search instead. Redirects do no harm, we don't normally delete them if they are plausible. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen, but I think they are other companies, as in one book he talks about Anonima Italiana Petroli of Piacenza, another says that it subsequently became Società Petrolifera Italiana... I think the books deal with other companies. InterComMan (talk) 10:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

API Raffineria di Ancona moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to API Raffineria di Ancona. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 13:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gruppo API has been nominated for deletion

Category:Gruppo API has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 20:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UniverGas Italia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to UniverGas Italia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UniverGas Italia (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UniverGas Italia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InterComMan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 15:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shell plc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Augusta. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi InterComMan. Thank you for your work on TotalEnergies Italia. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A bit of a complex corporate history, but it seems reasonable to start a page for this Italian subsidiary.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 15:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18 June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 06:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You remove information from pages (like shareholders), and I would be the vandal? You better stop before being reported to some administrator. InterComMan (talk) 06:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Left guide (talk) 11:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UniverGas Italia (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reconrabbit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All references are routine business transactions or trivial coverage of the business. Nothing indicates that this is a particularly notable gas company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UniverGas Italia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Recon rabbit 16:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flash Fiber (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flash Fiber and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Vodafone India

added links pointing to Partner, Equity, Lichtenstein and Income Tax Act

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lowercase title at Ho Mobile

Hi, I note your edits at this article. The stable version of the article adequately reflects the stylisms that may be used for this brand; I've reverted to it. See MOS:LEAD and MOS:BOLDLEAD. The lead sentence should indeed use the article title. 162 etc. (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no, it's an incorrect stylism. InterComMan (talk) 16:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the talkpage and find consensus before making such edits. 162 etc. (talk) 20:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Professional Adriazeri (talk) 16:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox instructions

I know you're aware that infoboxes have instructions for their use in their documentation, as you've been pointed to them several times now. However you still make edits against what people are telling you are in the infobox documentation as in this edit. If you continue to make edits against infobox instructions, and continue to ignore what people are telling you, you will be blocked for willful disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 12:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: API Ancona Refinery (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Gruppo API. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:API Ancona Refinery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isybank (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isybank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 01:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tessellis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Market.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vodafone India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Income Tax Act.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wind Vision, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages On-demand and Multi-screen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three?

Why did you revert my edits to the Three article? The manual of style is clear on various aspects such as bold links in the lead and overlinking things like country names. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no overlinking InterComMan (talk) 10:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He has unfortunately got a history of disruptive editing and baiting people into edit wars, how he hasn’t been disallowed from editing is simply beyond me. Adriazeri (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 3 (company). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adriazeri (talk) 11:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:InterComMan reported by User:Adriazeri (Result: ). Thank you. Adriazeri (talk) 16:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You were warned you would be blocked if you continued your disruptive editing, but you appear to have ignored that. You are willing to make constructive edits after you return from this block, but if you continue your current pattern you may end up blocked again. Canterbury Tail talk 18:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 18:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huawei Symantec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symantec.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Symantec

You've been reverted multiple times, by multiple people. I would have reverted you also, given the opportunity. Please stop it, until you get consensus. Which won't happen because your rationale is not very good. -- GreenC 14:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:InterComMan. Second warning re: Special:Diff/1257143201/1258143245. The discussion at Talk:Symantec#Redirect clearly demonstrates a lack of consensus. You have been warned multiple times already. If you do it again, I am reporting you to ANI. You were blocked 15 days ago at a different ANI case of edit warring, you would likely be blocked again for an extended period. This is your final warning before turning over to the administrators at ANI. -- GreenC 17:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:UniverGas Italia

Hello, InterComMan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UniverGas Italia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Act! LLC

added a link pointing to Symantec

PC Tools (company)

added a link pointing to Symantec

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]