User talk:Intellisighter
August 2024
[edit]
Hello! I'm Egghead06. Your recent edit(s) to the page 2024–25 Premier League appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 01:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, I believed he had been sacked, not by mutual consent, but you're right, cheers for your message. - Intellisighter (talk) 10:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Sucina
[edit]I live in Sucina, Spain and wondering why you reverted my edits? Mounttriviama (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- They were removed as I did not believe them to be constructive. - Intellisighter (talk) 22:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- How so? The article contains many grammatical and factual errors which I am working on correcting. Do you know the town? Mounttriviama (talk) 04:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Captain (association football) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To be clear, as the person who wants to change the prior wording, you have the burden of establishing that your change is an improvement. You cannot simply impose your change and then say that any other version is "unexplained." 1995hoo (talk) 13:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I cannot eh? Well seems I can as I already have - Intellisighter (talk) 13:05, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Nice try. 1995hoo (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 1995hoo (talk) 13:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Naturi Naughton
[edit]If you had taken the time to read my edits (or asked me) before reverting them you would have saw that they are constructive. I cleaned up the wording through the page and added a ref that includes quotes from Lil Kim since the previous ref and info did not support her actual feelings towards Naughton and Notorious. 12.75.126.56 (talk) 13:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2024 (UTC)