User talk:InnovativePotential

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electrochemically Activated Chemotherapy (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiDan61 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Electrochemically Activated Chemotherapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, InnovativePotential! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Bad username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "InnovativePotential", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:58, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Innovative Potential is the name of the company that holds the patent on the Electrochemically Activated Chemotherapy technique.

References

October 2023

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner.--VViking_TalkEdits 22:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

You idiots are ignoring a cancer cure advancement in favour of a scaffolding.

Ignoring content over regulation.

Go fix my article instead opposing me, go make those amendments instead of pissing me off. InnovativePotential (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.--VViking_TalkEdits 22:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Electrochemically Activated Chemotherapy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Electrochemically Activated Chemotherapy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 22:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

I am Jordache Boudreau the only author on the subject material over a 15 year period spanning 2009-2024.

www.Innovativepotential.com is the company website.

that website and the company are never directly mentioned on the EAC wiki article page, as a safe guard for the company.

The reviewers are unable to distinguish the difference between notability through the direct citation of primary source articles, 2 patents a peer review article, and a master of science thesis, versus some variety magazine article.

You organization isn't worth the money with volunteers like them.

one person dies every 3 seconds in the world, and something like this, is worth the lives of every wikipedia editor.

Don't you deserve better functioning medicine? I do. You should know about it too.

Instead I'm confronted by a bunch've illiterate retards without oa lick of sense who are unable to see the forest for the trees. you ant to knwo what a self promotion looks like? It looks like this:

I am Jordache Boudreau, I nvented a cancer cure out of antoher cancer cure, here's 4 book on how I'm better than you in every possible way, and how you will never amount to anything. one person dies every three seconds from cancer in earth, and for the cost of a battery and pencil lead, you can make a drug that can be found in 3rd world africa work 100% better against a disease that has existed since the dawn of time across all species. InnovativePotential (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

• Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
• Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 22:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

You deserve the deaths which you curate. InnovativePotential (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

www.theinnovativepotential.com/publications

Go make me my wikipedia article for me then. InnovativePotential (talk) 23:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Not until the topic is notable. When that happens, someone may write about it.

At this time, there is no evidence that it is notable.

And there is ample evidence of you utterly failing to understand what "notability" actually means.

I'll make it easy for you. See the criteria in WP:Golden Rule. You failed to supply even one single source that meets the criteria in there. Until multiple sources exist that meet those criteria, Wikipedia cannot have an article on the topic.

I suggest you cool off, read the documents people have pointed out to you, try to understand what you have been told, and appeal your block. The instructions are in your block message, and if you follow the links, they are very detailed. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:49, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Talk Page Access revoked

(edit conflict) In the light of your insulting comment left after your block, I decided to remove your access to edit this talk page. Even prior to your block, your attitude to other volunteer editors was unacceptable. Here are just a few examples of immature insults you have hurled at others today:

• "I invented a cancer cure out of another cancer cure, here's 4 book on how I'm better than you in every possible way, and how you will never amount to anything."
• "You organization isn't worth the money with volunteers like them. one person dies every 3 seconds in the world, and something like this, is worth the lives of every wikipedia editor."
• "You can't differentiate the difference between fact and gossip you idiot robot."

It must be frustrating to want to promote one's life's research here on Wikipedia and find that you are not permitted to. But that is not what this encyclopaedia is for. If, or hopefully when, your discoveries and processes becomes notable enough to be written about by unconnected persons, then it will undoubtedly be a wonderful addition to this encyclopaedia. But whatever happens along the way, we expect editors (old and new) to avoid hurling bullying insults at other editors.

If the blocking editor (Seraphimblade) or Anachronist feel it is worth giving you another chance, then I am happy for them to reinstate the Talk Page Access which I just removed for the reasons explained. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

For my part, I'll say that if you're willing to cool off and discuss things in a civil manner, send me an email saying so (just go to my talk page and click "Email this user"), and I'll reinstate your talk page access so we can do that. And it may even be that we come to terms that I would be willing to unblock you, though it would not be to continue the promotional activity. But if all you're going to do is attack people, there's no value in any further conversation, and if that's so, the decision to revoke your talk page access was entirely correct. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)