User talk:Innersmile108
The article Gopal bhatt goswami has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Gopal bhatt goswami
[edit]A tag has been placed on Gopal bhatt goswami, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ǝuɪuǝsɐ (ʞɿɐʇ) sʇdpǝ 17:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Gopal bhatt goswami
[edit]A tag has been placed on Gopal bhatt goswami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. // Chris (complaints)•(contribs) 17:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. Exploding Boy (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do NOT repost deleted material
[edit]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Gopal bhatt goswami
[edit]A tag has been placed on Gopal bhatt goswami, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 17:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- What we have here is a failure to communicate. This is not the place to dump source text, nor may you remove deletion notices. If you insist on behaving this way, you'll lose your edit privileges.--PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
He just did ...
Blocked!
[edit]
Let's try this again:
[edit]You cannot cut and paste material from other sites. The text came from [1]. Also, you cannot disrupt this site via your talk page. It's a privilege to be able to use your talk page during a block in order to work out problems. If you insist on posting this text here, you'll lose that privilege as well. When the block lifts, you may write about the subject in your own words. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Please, just give it a rest. The page has been deleted multiple times and you've been temporarily blocked as a result. House rules. Furthermore: It is a violation of copyright and therefore against the law to post it here. OK? You'll lose your talk page privileges if you insist on misusing it. If you wish to contest the block, follow the instructions on the block notice. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Radharaman, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Radha Raman. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Radharaman
[edit]A tag has been placed on Radharaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ejay (talk) 07:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Talk:Radha Raman
[edit]A tag has been placed on Talk:Radha Raman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Talk:Radha Raman|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ejay (talk) 07:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, Gopal bhatt goswami, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vrindavan.org/English/VSaints/GopalaBhattaGoswami.html. As a copyright violation, Gopal bhatt goswami appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Gopal bhatt goswami has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Gopal bhatt goswami and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Gopal bhatt goswami with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Gopal bhatt goswami.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 07:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Warning
[edit] This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Grsz11 (talk) 07:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Your articles
[edit]Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia. The article that you're posting repeatedly is being deleted because it is copied from another site. Thus, it constitutes a copyright violation, unless you're the copyright holder. All the Wikipedia text is licensed under GFDL -- please do not post copyrighted content here. utcursch | talk 07:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
[edit]