User talk:Inkbotttt

Welcome!

Hi Inkbotttt! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! NemesisAT (talk) 13:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arunita Kanjilal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arunita Kanjilal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Waddles 🗩 🖉 06:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nihal Tauro moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nihal Tauro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with disruptive editors

Hello, I noticed your edit summaries on Pawandeep Rajan, and if you're having any trouble with another user, you can report them at the admin noticeboard and have an admin handle them. Please read the instructions and headers on the page properly when leaving a message there. Waddles 🗩 🖉 15:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Thank you for contributing to the article Arunita Kanjilal. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pawandeep Rajan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pawandeep Rajan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawandeep Rajan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eevee01^(talk) 02:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I would like to ask you one thing. Before adding deletation notice have you even researched about Pawandeep Rajan ? He is enough notable to be on Wikipedia. I would like to request Wikipedia Administrator team to look into this matter.

Inkbotttt (talk) 06:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Inkbotttt. The deletion discussion has started now so the best thing you can do now continue to improve the article and also request that the page is kept at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawandeep Rajan, explaining why you feel it meets guidelines like WP:GNG. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maheshtala College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NAAC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Yash Dasgupta

Some of your recent edits to Yash Dasgupta page are not suitable and having no source, they are now reverted. Iamrajdeepdas (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not re-add content immediately after it is removed as a result of an articles for deletion discussion as you did with Pawandeep Rajan. Waddles 🗩 🖉 16:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Neha Kakkar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Eevee01^(talk) 13:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shreya Ghoshal, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — DaxServer (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nihal Tauro

Hello, Inkbotttt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nihal Tauro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nihal Tauro

Hello, Inkbotttt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nihal Tauro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pawandeep Rajan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pawandeep Rajan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawandeep Rajan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 11:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Musicfaneditor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Musicfaneditor. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]