User talk:Ingenosa

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ingenosa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 09:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Wright

Hi, when you moved the page that was at Jeffrey Wright and then slapped a disambiguation page there instead, a number of links to the actor were broken. As an alternative, it's perfectly OK to leave the existing page alone and create a disambiguation page at (name) (disambiguation) - in this case Jeffrey Wright (disambiguation). Please consider this approach in future cases? thanks. --AndrewHowse (talk) 23:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Generally those things are not looked into except when the user is sockpuppeting. Cirt (talk) 09:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Question on Globcal Block

Some points:

1) I do not have access to information regarding IP addresses for edits, especially deleted edits.

2) If I had such information, I would not give it to you.

3) No one else on Wikipedia will give you that information, either, because it would be a massive violation of Wikipedia's privacy policy.

4) There are exceptions, but to be perfectly blunt it's clear from your message that your case doesn't qualify, as it appears to be a fishing expedition in support of some sort of petty rivalry, and those people who have the authority to grant such exceptions to the privacy policy are highly unlikely to do so in your case. This link has more information.

I hope that answers your question. Please also note that if you have a conflict of interest yourself on the subject, you're equally subject to our policy regarding such things. Thank you.

--Calton | Talk 13:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing the article because D. Jeffrey Wright founded it and he is a neighbor

Then you do, in fact, have a conflict of interest (COI) -- your frankly bizarre and inapt analogy to citizenship being some sort of COI aside -- and should let disinterested third parties who have some sort of perspective on the issue actually write such an article. And, as it appears from your original message to me and from your edit history, you should also not try playing "cop" -- you have no power or authority whatsoever to extend page protection yourself as you attempted to do nor should have even thought about attempting to snoop out people's IP addresses -- nor should you bring your petty real-world organizational rivalries onto Wikipedia. --Calton | Talk 13:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: A pre-emptive warning regarding your edit summary here: there are no "International Authorities who are investigating the IPs", there never will be any "International Authorities who are investigating the IPs", and no one on Wikipedia is going to even help you with any alleged quest to get these unnamed "International Authorities" to "investigat[e] the IPs". In addition, any attempt to try to use such claims to stifle, discourage, block, inhibit, or influence other editors' attempts to make legitimate edits would run you immediately afoul of Wikipedia's "No legal threats" policy and would get you blocked from editing until you retracted any such claims. Do not bring your petty real-world battles onto Wikipedia.

P.P.S.: IP editors have to same right to comment that named editors do: do NOT remove legitimate comments as you did here again. --Calton | Talk 14:07, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought appreciating your good work and asking you for some advice

No, you began with some crude flattery -- nearly the same thing you tried with User:Cirt back in May -- and asked for help in conducting a witch hunt. For the latter, if you had even thought for half-a-second about what you were asking -- extracting private personal information for the purpose of pursuing a vendetta -- you would have realized how wildly inappropriate, even immoral, that request was, especially for someone coming from, as you claim, Venezuela: would you find it the least bit okay if someone from your government approached me for the same information about YOU?

...it is very clear that illegitimate [emphasis added] wiki IP special contributors from Indonesia...

Once again, wrong. IP contributors are not second-class citizens nor, especially, are they "illegitimate". You are in no position -- none -- to assert authority nor do you even have moral or rational standing here. Once again, you're not a cop and any attempt play one on Wikipedia will, as the Brits like to say, end in tears. I've been on Wikipedia four years, and believe me, you're not the first -- or even one of the first dozen -- I've seen start down the road you're on. It's not a path you want to be taking.

Good luck in finding a mentor, but you're going to hear the same things from them, just like User:Cirt tried to do with you subtly back in May. --Calton | Talk 15:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Globcal International

Ciao, Ingenosa. Thank you for contributing the Globcal International article; as you indicated, it needs additional references to reliable sources, so I have moved it to your userspace at User:Ingenosa/Globcal International until its notability can be established. Regards, Skomorokh 17:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Chancellor of Order of Royal Honor India

Hello Ingenosa, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Chancellor of Order of Royal Honor India - a page you tagged - because: Which banned user created this article? Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 20:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

D. Jeffrey Wright

Please do not undo revisions without first reviewing the discussion page. I believe that the edits that I made do not attack the subject. The edits - and the request for speedy deletion - were reviewed by a Wikipedia Administrator. If you wish to improve the article by providing accurate and verifiable information, please do so. My edits have been made only to improve the article and to make it worthy, if possible, of inclusion in Wikipedia.

Please respect the guidelines for Wikipedia and respect challenges to the article. If you believe that the challenges and edits are unwarrented, please say so in the discussion page. I'm pretty sure that the goal is to reach consensus on articles and not to completely reject comments and suggestions. Lacbolg (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of D. Jeffrey Wright

I have nominated D. Jeffrey Wright, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. Jeffrey Wright. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 03:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Globcal.jpg

The file File:Globcal.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Globcal International for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Globcal International, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Globcal International until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]