User talk:IngeborgWiltoft

IngeborgWiltoft, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi IngeborgWiltoft! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, IngeborgWiltoft. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Derek Andrews (talk) 11:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hanne Albert

Good work on your first article, Hanne Albert. I have made a few improvements to the formatting by adding wikilinks and categories. I also improved the format of one reference; a great tool for adding references with wikipedia's preferred format is Wikipedia:RefToolbar/2.0, particularly for journals. Simply find the paper online, then paste its url into the URL field and click the search icon. This should autofill the template for you, but before you are done click the calendar icon next to Access date, and give the the reference a unique name in the RefName field. The latter lets you reuse the reference elsewhere in the article just by referring to its name and shortens the list of references. I hope this is of help to you, let me know if you need any assistance. I hope you will stick around and help grow the encyclopaedia. Derek Andrews (talk) 12:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Hanne Albert.png

Hello, IngeborgWiltoft. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Hanne Albert.png — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. David Gerard (talk) 08:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IngeborgWiltoft. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:IngeborgWiltoft. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=IngeborgWiltoft|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 08:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello David, is this the place where I reply? regards Ingeborg