User talk:Indu Singh

Welcome, Indu Singh!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.

- zappa.jake at 09:50, Wednesday, December 4, 2024 (UTC)

Hi Indu, saw your contribution to Sobha Singh. Thanks for improving the article. Haphar 16:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ditto and other Sikhi articles; much appreciated; thanks. --Hari Singh 23:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cotton Corporation of India

A tag has been placed on Cotton Corporation of India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Avruch ^Talk 00:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BIMARU

Your edit quoting TOI. Please read the TOI article that you have quoted - it actually says Bihar teachers are bette educated and UP are still better - not what you say. The worst state is Gujarat followed by Karnataka. To be fair, the headline of the TOI article is misleading.

NowCommons: Image:2006 08 26 Phulkari.JPG

Image:2006 08 26 Phulkari.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Patiala Phulkari.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Patiala Phulkari.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:29, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Indu Singh! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sajjan Kumar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stained glass

A stunning window, but not a very high quality photo. When you introduce a photo to a section, you need to look carefully at the context. The context in which you inserted that pic was a gallery of horizontally formatted images of building interiors, that showed the windows within their present day settings, ranging from Medieval to modern, and including secular examples. Not the right place.

There are hundreds of stained glass files stored on Wikimedia Commons, and the ones selected for the article are those that illustrate the history and technology in a very apt way. It took hours to find and research them. Sometimes a new one appears in the article because it fills a gap, or offers a better example, or shows (like the recently added Richyer window at Cologne Cathedral) a different technology or approach to design.

Can I suggest that you write a small article on St Michael's Church and add it there?

Amandajm (talk) 01:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]