User talk:Indruraz
Welcome to my communication page
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Indruraz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Worldbruce (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
- Thanks for your Suggestion. Indruraz (talk) 11:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worldbruce
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worldbruce, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Scr★pIronIV 13:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your Suggestion. Indruraz (talk) 14:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Your edit on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Armaanaziz/Archive
[edit]I have reverted your edit since only SPI-clerks can do things like that, your sock puppetry accusation against Worldbruce also seems to be totally unsubstantiated, and can be seen as harassment. Don't do it again or you will most likely find yourself blocked. Thomas.W talk 15:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your Suggestion. This sock puppetry accusation against also seems to be totally substantiated and it's useless against Worldbruce harassment can not be seen. Rather, me being harassed but i'm not Sockpuppetry. Please suggest any query, input my talk page and can give any advice. Thank You. Indruraz (talk) 10:09 AM, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Armaanaziz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Worldbruce (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your Suggestion, but i'm not Sockpuppetry. Indruraz (talk) 11:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)