User talk:Indirus
reply
[edit]An article must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references. As a matter of policy, all biographies of living people will be deleted if they do not have references. Although you have given references, one is just a blog, and it's not clear tome that the Spanish ones are proper sources. If this guy really is notable, there should be coverage in mainstream media in either Spanish or English
The "celebrities" don't have links to wikipedia articles, which doesn't help establish notabilty
It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic
- working with celebrities... that doesn't make him notable
- exclusive... legendary Celia... extensive world-wide touring experience spammy language without an in-line reference
- ® trade marking is spammy too
- While under his management, Celia Cruz earned.. no in-line reference to suggest that it's because of him
- keeping the Celia Cruz legacy alive. spammy
He may well be notable, but you need proper references, which support the text, links to related articles, and an encyclopaedic tone without the adulation, trade marks, Mr. etc Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:00, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Omer Pardillo Cid.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! tausif r (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?
[edit]![]() |
Hello! Indirus,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sarah (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Pol430 talk to me 15:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)