User talk:LocalStatePolitics

Welcome

Hello, Independent NH Politics, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is LocalStatePolitics's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Brodie Deshaies has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brodie Deshaies. Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Independent NH Politics. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 21:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brodie Deshaies (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is written as if it is his platform. Anything that is sourced to his website, that of his campaign or any other source that is affiliated with him needs to be removed along with the content attributed to it. The same for any content is not sourced. Wikipedia is not is not a form of promotion. It is clear this is written by someone closely connected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brodie Deshaies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brodie Deshaies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Independent NH Politics! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brodie Deshaies

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created. after I removed the promotional content

As reviewing administrator, I need to warn you: Since this is your only contribution, and since it is written in the format of a press release, it is reasonable to ask whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on Conflict of Interest If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of the organization, see also WP:PAID for the necessary disclosures. this is not optional

In particular, do not restore the promotional campaign material I added to the article. If you do so, you are likely to be blocked.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please declare your COI

Hi Independent NH Politics, please read the conflict of interest notice I left you above. Without revealing any personal information, what is your affiliation with Brodie Deshaies? S0091 (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (now) LocalStatePolitics, thank your for your message on my talk page stating you do not have a COI. I am posting a note here to retain the history. I will also leave you some additional information about editing Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions! S0091 (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI username notice

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Independent NH Politics", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Dostie (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Donald Dostie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Donald Dostie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurie Sanborn (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laurie Sanborn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laurie Sanborn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for more information regarding denial of page creation: Laurie Sanborn

Laurie Sanborn is involved in leadership in a US State legislature. She is most certainly a person of interest and is an extremely important person at the New Hampshire State Legislature. I strongly disagree with your dissertation that the sources are not primarily about her / she is mentioned secondary. The other deputy leader in the NH house (same position as Sanborn) has far less sources and his page is active. Fred Doucette What is the difference between Sanborn and Doucette? Independent NH Politics (talk)

@Independent NH Politics: Hello, I have accepted the article but note that the article can be expanded from 'stub' to at least 'start'. You should try and add more content about the subject. There's a lot to add out there. I'm not chanced or else I would have help expand the article. So just try and add more informations and remember to back it up with reliable sources. Thanks and all the best. 👍Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laurie Sanborn has been accepted

Laurie Sanborn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome LocalStatePolitics!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,255,006 registered editors!

Hello, LocalStatePolitics. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

Introduction to Wikipedia (and editing)

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Sarasota, Florida for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Sarasota, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Sarasota, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 06:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi I see you’re a new editor and I’ve just put an article you created up for deletion. Please don’t be discouraged by this. It takes time to work out what the basis for a good article is, and we all make false starts. If you think the article should be kept you can make your points in the deletion discussion, but in any case I’d encourage you to keep searching for notable topics to write about. If I can be of any help please leave a message on my talk page. Mccapra (talk) 06:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Karoline Leavitt

Hello, LocalStatePolitics. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karoline Leavitt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Karoline Leavitt

Hello, LocalStatePolitics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karoline Leavitt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]