User talk:Incerto501

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Tenenbaums

See WP:SPOILER. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Also, I question if it's really a spoiler anyway, since they begin to reconcile before the 1-hour mark. Ribbet32 (talk) 20:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that Vader is Anakin Sywalker is in the first sentence of Darth Vader and that he's Luke's father is right at the top of that article. WP:SPOILER: "Spoilers are no different from any other content and should not be deleted solely because they are spoilers." Also, see WP:OTHERSTUFF - the fact that one article doesn't have something doesn't mean all other articles have to be the same. Ribbet32 (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Cuomo

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. KyleJoan^talk 02:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to start a war with anyone, I thought we were collaborating here. That's why I took out the Mediaite source and removed the part about "joined Lemann." Why did you remove all of the text instead of adding more sources? I see it's already been added back so I suppose the opportunity is still there for us to do that. Cheers. Incerto501 (talk) 02:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The point has been made that it was "inappropriate" per the network. Anything more than that would be superfluous. There are scholars weighing in on media-related news every day. We could easily inundate the article with quotes from ten op-eds on this matter if we wanted to, but that's not how BLPs work. KyleJoan^talk 02:27, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incerto501, As I see it, I don't believe you did anything wrong here. You added neutrally-worded text from high-quality sources. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 03:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of films featuring the Wilhelm scream (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please find external news sources that compile such a list of uses of scream. Do not cite IMDb.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of films featuring the Wilhelm scream and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of films featuring the Wilhelm scream, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Incerto501! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Ice Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fishtail. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Is"/"were"

Hi – I saw your query on Tomaten05's talk page. The reason is that American English uses the singular when talking about a band, while British English uses the plural – as a Brit myself, it doesn't sound strange to me at all to say "The Beatles are a rock band from Liverpool" or "UB40 are a reggae band from Birmingham". This is why the R.E.M. and Soundgarden pages (American bands) use "is" and the Beatles and Pink Floyd (English bands) use "are". The guideline you are looking for is MOS:PLURALS and also English plurals#Singulars with collective meaning treated as plural – hope this helps. In general you will find articles about American subjects use American English (organized, traveled, center) and articles about British, Australian and New Zealand subjects use British English (organised, travelled, centre). Richard3120 (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Richard3120:, thanks for the clarification and article! I've noticed that some pages use the "s" rather than "z" convention (realise, scrutinise, etc.) and the "u" in colour and favourite. I had no idea about this singular/plural convention but this makes sense. Cheers. Incerto501 (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fixer (person), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Kelly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of films featuring the Wilhelm scream

Hello, Incerto501. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of films featuring the Wilhelm scream, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of films featuring the Wilhelm scream

Hello, Incerto501. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of films featuring the Wilhelm scream".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]