User talk:Inc889

September 2023

Please take the time to review MOS:PUFFERY. Your continued edits to Beyoncé have been reverted and further edits of the same nature will be considered disruptive editing. Breaktheicees (talk) 04:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gizelle Bryant, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Explain how appearances of the these shows are not sourced. Please show examples of sources for filmography. Specialkay12 (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BURDEN which states that "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material" - reliable sources discussing the appearances are necessary for verification. Waxworker (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

There isn't verifiable information that Gizelle was a model. The source provided isn't based off of first hand interviews and there are no quotes which she mentions modelling or photos available. I was unable to find any reliable sources stating this was something she did in the past. Medievalonion (talk) 01:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a discussion. The Gizelle Bryant page is not your personal wiki. I have already states the "source" you provided is a blog and unreliable. I actually did look for further sources, did not find any, and requested for you to do the same.

Either find a better source or keep it off. Medievalonion (talk) 19:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not meant for personal use to erase information not to your liking. It is states use references and citation to support articles writing. There are many forms of references hence why it gives you these options in citations link. Inc889 (talk) 01:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is first hand interviews of mention of modelling and images. Would you want a link of this to be directed to you. Inc889 (talk) 01:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was one citation referencing modeling by Nicki Swift, a notoriously unreliable tabloid. I've asked for better sources multiple times.

Modeling ones own products also does not make someone a model. Medievalonion (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need anything directed to me, it should be in the wiki Medievalonion (talk) 20:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]