Jump to content

User talk:InNuce

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, InNuce, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 04:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lighting energy

[edit]

thanks for your response on that talk page. i am mostly familiar with my own case studies in california buildings, where we have seen lighting energy vary between 25 and 60 percent of the total energy bill (including heating and cooling and gas usage) perhaps the east coast distorts the national averages since they have higher winter gas and oil heating costs...im perplexed but this is a very important issue...any further enlihgtenment you have would be helpful since i am planning to write further articles on lighting energy design and conseration. regards Anlace 18:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thnks for the response on lighting energy...we ll both have to be on the lookout for other references to use, best regards, Anlace 00:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding a few lines about Razor's Edge. I've always felt it needed a mention there :-) Cribananda 03:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi InNuce,

Thanks for your introdution and comments. I am just trying to cover basic information on what is gernerally felt to be an important energy saving technology that has become widely used, in the UK and Australia. ESM's reduce a vast amount of otherwise wasted energy a fact substatiated by independent research(Battelle Labs). As such ESM's offer a fast commercial payback, which is vital if a green approach is to be adopted widely by industry. Examples in context are key to increasing an understanding of such technologies so that all may benefit. If you feel you are better placed to introduce suitable impartial examples to wikipedia, or have further knowlegde of the technology I welcome your input.

Ramble4hours 21:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

W.Somerset Maugham

[edit]

Given your previous or current interest in Somerset Maugham - can you please add any thoughts you might have at Talk:W. Somerset Maugham#What next? Peer Review? so that we can move the article up a notch? VirtualSteve 09:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

[edit]

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:BrookfieldZoo.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]