User talk:In23065/Archive/2007

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello In23065/Archive/2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- KHM03 19:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Celebrity Big Brother 2008 (UK) eye.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Celebrity Big Brother 2008 (UK) eye.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Big Brother sidebar

Please comment here about the recent changes to the template. Tra (Talk) 20:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

BB on More4

Hi I have removed More4 again as a broadcaster for BB UK. Just because it was shown in a documentary about Channel4's 25 year history doesn't make it a broadcaster. In order for More4 to be counted as a broadcaster they would have actually have to aired a series of Big Brother. This is the same case in the US with VH1, VH1 aired a special about BB US but just because they aired a special doesn't mean they are included in the broadcaster section. I hope you understand. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 21:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Big Brother (UK)

Please do not add speculation to articles. Continuation to do so may result in you being blocked from editing. Please also note that fair use images are not permitted on your user page. Thanks. ^anemone│_projectors 19:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

A "fair use" or non-free image is basically one that is copyrighted. Fair use means that under US law, you can use copyrighted images without requiring permission from the copyright holder (however it doesn't mean you can use the images anywhere you like). As Wikipedia is hosted in the United States, the laws of fair use apply to Wikipedia. Wikipedia's policy on non-free content is fairly complicated, and there are restrictions on the location of these images. The policy states that "Non-free content is allowed only in articles (not disambiguation pages), and only in article namespace" i.e. not in your userspace. Basically, the logo you had on your userpage is only allowed to be used in the article for the television series it relates to. I hope this helps. For more information, read Wikipedia:Non-free content. ^anemone│_projectors 20:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The X Factor (Denmark)

A tag has been placed on The X Factor (Denmark) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alexfusco5 00:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The X Factor (Kazakhstan)

I have nominated The X Factor (Kazakhstan), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The X Factor (Kazakhstan). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. EJF (talk) 12:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. ^anemone│_projectors 15:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. The template was better before. ^anemone│_projectors 15:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

But i think it is better now and i gives much more information in much littler space In23065 (talk) 15:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Still, this isn't Big Brother, there's no need to create a new template and copy theirs. It's fine as it was. ^anemone│_projectors 15:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Whats wrong with creating a new template and copy theirs if it makes the arctile better then it goodIn23065 (talk) 15:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't make it any different. I'll add the voice over artists to the current template, but there's no need to make another one. Having all the sections collapsible makes it look very strange. ^anemone│_projectors 16:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

It makes the information much more easier to read and is compact. In23065 (talk) 16:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

OK i'll do a deal with you. u can have your infobox and i can have my sidebar. In23065 (talk) 16:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I'll do a better deal. The infobox stays, and I'll edit the current template so it's more compact and has former presenters and judges in separate boxes, so it's a cross between both. ^anemone│_projectors 16:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Why do you want to keep it so much. It is not need and if you want a a fight i will take this to the admins and i think they will agree that smaller templates are better than big ever templates In23065 (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, I think the current information should be displayed, and the information on former presenters and judges, maybe that can be hidden. It's just better to have the current information on display. It's not even that big! It's essentialy an infobox and infoboxes don't have any hidden information on them, some of those are huge. ^anemone│_projectors 16:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I will agree to that as long as you edited upon Template:The X Factor UK sidebar In23065 (talk)

Why? There's no difference, but it's better to edit the existing one than the newly created one. ^anemone│_projectors 16:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)