User talk:Imranhusain

Welcome!

Hello, Imranhusain, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Largest gathring on earth, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gronk Oz (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Largest gathring on earth

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Largest gathring on earth. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of largest human gatherings on earth. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of largest human gatherings on earth – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of largest peaceful gatherings in history to List of largest human gatherings on earth (your addition has since been removed by another user). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of largest peaceful gatherings in history, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding incorrect information to this article ,and requesting invalid additions. The sources you are quoting do no tsayhtat those crowds occured on one day, they say that the estimates are for the duration of the multi-day events. Meters (talk) 21:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of largest peaceful gatherings in history. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stop adding this. Teh sources clearly say that the estimates are for the duration of the multi-day events rather than single-day crowds. Meters (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make these claims you will need to provide WP:RELIABLE SOURCES to show that the crowd estimates are for one day. Meters (talk) 02:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of largest peaceful gatherings in history. Blogs and user-generated sites are not reliable sources. Wikias are not reliable sources. Mirrors of Wikipedia are not reliable sources. Meters (talk) 20:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imranhusain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

thanks for give me information i am new on Wikipedia before you block me i don't khow that multiple accouts are not allowed in it so i am sorry for it plz unblock me i will not do same mistake again if do so than block me for ever Imranhusain (talk) 15:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't just an innocent mistake because you are new. You were using this alternate account in an attempt to mislead us. You will need a more compelling explanation for your actions. Yamla (talk) 14:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

thanks for give me information i am new on Wikipedia before you block me i don't khow that multiple accouts are not allowed in it so i am sorry for it plz unblock me i will not do same mistake again if do so than block me for ever Imranhusain (talk) 15:41, 30 November 2016 Imranhusain (talk) 07:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plz Un Block Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imranhusain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not misleading you i only have 2 accounts with same IP address in which one used by my brother and one is by me we both don't know that this is not allowed so now plzz un-block us we dont make same mistake again our only aim is to update Wikipedia articles and upload my onw Articals on this website now we use different IP add for different ID plz help us now our first aim is to find more ditales and rules of Wikipedia and work according to then under rules Imranhusain (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you're told in no uncertain terms that you would get blocked if you continue to add improperly referenced content to Wikipedia. And at that very moment you stop editing but "your brother" continues to add that same improperly referenced content to the same article? And you didn't feel you were behaving improperly by trying to avoid accountability? See also WP:FAMILY I do not see that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 17:27, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imranhusain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

thanks for give me WP:FAMILY friend as i told u we are new on Wikipedia so don't know all things about it But Now I am trying to get information first and than upload I Have written 3-4 articals with strong references and want to upload it so plz unblock me but as u said "I do not see that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia"so for that i have said previously that if I do mistake again so block me forever but now i am trying to do my work under more laws and regulations of Wikipedia and donot give any chance for blocking me plz unblock meImranhusain (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In more ways than one, the editing history of the two accounts does not look at all like that of two brothers: it looks like one person using a second account to avoid a possible block he had been warned against. As long as it seems that you are not being totally honest it is unlikely that you will be unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Plz unblock me Imranhusain (talk) 12:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historicity of Muhammad

Have you read the above mentioned article? Don't you think we should do something about it? I'm new to this editing stuff. I don't understand why i can't get it deleted. Even if i'd try to edit it with valid sources, the administrators would revert it. And even if this article's Subject line matches the so-called policy of Wikipedia, the content it contains is nothing but hoax! Haxeeb1987 (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]