User talk:ImpuMozhi

This user may have left Wikipedia. ImpuMozhi has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Home	Talk	Memo	Gallery

Hot diggity dog

Thanks for all your great work! miss you! (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.12.173.50 (talk)

Hey!!

hey hey hey!!! Look who's back! I was really wondering which remote part you have gone and hidden yourself.. So welcome back (look how tables turn, just the other day I was the newbie learning the tricks from you and now I am welcoming you:) and well thanks so much for the barnstar as well as your support to my RFA... Hope you'll stick around now -- Lost^(talk) 03:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you back, Impu. Please continue editing however low frequency it may be. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 05:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good

As best as I could tell, the gallery looks good now. Thanks for fixing it. I changed the external links into internal ones just so it looks nicer for you too. Kevin_b_er 16:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support!

Se la face ay pale, la cause est...

23:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

If I'm a bit pale in the face now,
it's because of the amazing support
during my recent request for adminship
and because of all those new shiny buttons.

And if in the future
my use of them should not always be perfect
please don't hesitate to shout at me
any time, sunset, noon or sunrise.

Thanks ImpuMozhi

Took me a while to get back to you for various reasons. Yes indeed I am still here! I also had a small break from wikipedia a few months back, it has been a real hectic year. Anyhow, ImpuMozhi if you remember it was your yourself who have kindly invited me to register in the first place. I have learnt so much from wikipedia (and being part of it) and all that is thanks to you. As for the photos, well many of them were actually already in wikipedia, such as the Jaivana's photo, which was already there in the Cannon article. Nevertheless, thankyou so much for the Barn Star, It felt nice as well when I saw it, thanks again!

Apart from that I'm quite surprised to learn from you about the relatively small number of people interested in Indian history, out of all the people in India that could speak English and have access to the Internet.. Another reason, which kept me in wikipedia is because of how disgusted I am of the continuous attempts to distort and simplify Asian history. Lastly, thanks for your wish with regards to the case, wouldn't say that trip was particularly happy due to the situation. In the past centuries, these internal family conflicts would have been much worse, as a historian yourself, I'm sure you can imagine. Nevertheless I have my own objectives in life (fortunately) which is to be an instigator of rural development and historic-conservation in Rajasthan, so these courtcases are just an unfortunate part of life that has to be dealt with.

Lastly, things would be much better though if I could reconcile with my grandma as soon as possible, after all it was not her fault, and she is the only grandparent I ever really got to know (as my Thai-grandfather passed away when I was 9).Devraj Singh 04:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi,

Can you please have a look at this article. I think the title is written wrongly. There should be halant at the end of both words. Just wanted to confirm from someone who understands the script better. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

On 27 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rajendrasinhji Jadeja, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 21:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ranganathaswamy Temple

I see that you moved this article. I do not object. However, some editors believe that when a name refers to one subject far more often than to others, that a simple search for that name should bring up the most commonly expected subject. In the case of Ranganathaswamy Temple, I think by far the most expected subject would be the temple at Srirangam, which is the largest temple in India, and also the largest temple currently used as a Hindu temple. I am only sharing this for your reference so that you will be aware of the issue. Sincerely, --BostonMA ^talk 20:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your comments on Talk:Carnatic music. You have reflected my stand in this dipute quite succintly. All I'm trying to bring is a neutral point of view to the article. A couple of users are unwilling to listen to reason. Any help from you to find a compromise will greatly help. Thanks Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 00:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images to commons

Hi, the image was apparently moved to commons (rather: copied there and deleted here) by commons:User:Stanmar, using my PushForCommons tool. Knowing what images to move, it might be better to use my CommonsHelper tool which is easier to use for such a purpose. It is not a bot, just a helper tool for manual upload, as it prepares a decent image description for commons.

You can use the tool yourself. You will have to create a new user account on commons, though. You can use the same user name as here, if it is not taken.

The page you gave me as a category is not a category, however, images uploaded through the CommonsHelper tool will automatically be caregorized under the name of the original uploader here, in your case, commons:Category:Files by User:ImpuMozhi from en.wikipedia (which is currently empty; feel free to edit it).

Hope that helps, --Magnus Manske 22:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!

I am deeply grateful for your appreciation. Althogh my time on Wikipedia is very little in recent weeks, I will try and contribute as much as I can. My next project will be to make Tamil literature a FAC. Any help will be appreciation. Thanks Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 18:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikibreak

well, you just were active, by telling me, weren't you. So you could as well just have fixed it yourself. I mean, I cannot be expected to look after all the damage WIN is doing, I'm not glued to the screen myself. Maybe it is time to look into dealing with WIN as a perpetual waste of time without producing one useful edit, ever. Anyway, please try not to use me as your wikibot, you either walk away in a huff and stop caring (which I would of course deplore), or else you know where the editing button is :) dab (𒁳) 22:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi,

Thanks for the wishes. I am really sad that I was not able to come online on my first wiki-anniversary. — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 06:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I award ImpuMozhi barnstar in appreciation of contributions to article related to India--Pinecar 23:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use of Image:Serfoji amarasimha Tanjore.jpg

The licensing of this image has been questioned. Can you please look into this? thanks Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 05:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use of Image:Serfoji amarasimha Tanjore.jpg

The fair use of this image has been questioned. Can you please look into this? thanks Parthi ^{talk/contribs} 05:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contact

After having spent some time in India on our various functions, we have come back to NZ, Auckland. I cannot be active on WP due to my old age problems. Ur Baraha is helping me a lot. I want to ask u some clarification on the same. Shall do next time.I have also forgotten the rules of WP.

How can I contact Mr Bhadani, as his talk page is protected.

--Dore chakravarty 00:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BARAHA

The documents are in Kannada and sent to me by email. How can I read these? They are worded like this sqmdata03. It is an sqm file as saved here.

--Dore chakravarty 01:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I don't have experience opening kannada documents. At the least, I could suggest Dore follow the steps at, Wikipedia:Kannada_Support and see if it helps. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 05:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you back?

So many people are on a break or have left Wikipedia these days. It would be lovely to see someone return. Gizza^Discuss ^© 12:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey My Friend

Where are you and how are you? Do need help on Gurkha since a bunch of vandals keep wrecking the history page. Hope all is well with you. Gorkhali 06:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Mysore

Hello,
Thanks for your review and comments. However, the article has already been promoted to FA. See Wikipedia:Featured Articles. However, those comments are valuable and need to be addressed. May I request you to move out those comments to Article talk page? orUser:Dineshkannambadi's talk page? He is the primary author of this FA and he did run the show in FAC, addressing all the concerns raised. Just a suggestion. Thanks again for your review. - KNM ^Talk 05:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Mysore

I have answered your questions on my talk page and made a few modifications to the article.thanksDineshkannambadi 20:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baraha

I want to send 2 sheets of kannada scanned for trial in BARAHA. How can I send them? A quick reply is welcome.

--Dore chakravarty (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Thank you very much. You could have asked me to do it.

--Dore chakravarty (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

How are you?

Gorkhali (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Thanks very much for the assistance.

--Dore chakravarty (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Dear Impumozhi,

I will be needing your help pretty shortly on the Singh article. There is a chap called Harrybabbar who has a history of being insulting and vandalising the Singh article with his POVs. He is very rude and I am sure he is going to try and make this article a political issue and try and steer it on a wrong course.

Cheers, Gorkhali (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User pi

A tag has been placed on Template:User pi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dikshitar.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dikshitar.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ncmvocalist (talk) 01:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Madakkavil

An article that you have been involved in editing, Madakkavil, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madakkavil (2nd nomination). Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Dakshina Gangotri

Please see Talk:Dakshina Gangotri#Requested move =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I've gone through your contributions and I appreciate the amount of effort you've put forth in them. It is great to have you back here after such a long wikibreak. tc.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 17:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would love to see you

Dear Impumozi,

If you are back, would love to have you work on the Singh article and Ranjit Singh article. I have cleaned up both of them a lot, but would love for you to take a look at what can be improved.

Cheers, your old friend,

Gorkhali (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saraswati

Can you give a source for File:Saraswati.jpg? Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Bhupendra Singh Patiala.jpg

File:Bhupendra Singh Patiala.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Bhupendra Singh Patiala.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Bhupendra Singh Patiala.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wodeyar 1881-1940.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wodeyar 1881-1940.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Transfer of power in India, 1947.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Transfer of power in India, 1947.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 12:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

		Greetings of the Season
		A merry good morning I wish you, My friends both great and small. When the world, for his fare, shall press you, may you n'er go to the wall. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 02:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Gandhi Boer War 1899.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gandhi Boer War 1899.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:)

Great to see you!

User:Chudasama

Do you have evidence for this edit? If so, please comment here. Thanks. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 20:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Congratulations

Thanks ImpuMozhi :) -- Tinu Cherian - 04:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kedarnath Agarwal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kedarnath Agarwal.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Maharana Pratap

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Maharana Pratap, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Encyclopedia Indica (1996). (See article talk for more detail.), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Maharana Pratap and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Maharana Pratap, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Maharana Pratap with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Maharana Pratap. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Maharana Pratap saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation

Copyright problem: Rajput clans

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Rajput clans, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://books.google.com/books?id=keEl6QKnuoYC&lpg=PA142&ots=P74Ub22n4o&dq=Each%20of%20these%20Vanshas%20or%20lineages%20is%20divided%20into%20several%20clans%20(kula)%2C%20all%20of%20whom%20claim%20direct%20patrilineage%20from%20a%20remote%20but%20common&pg=PA142#v=onepage&q=Each%20of%20these%20Vanshas%20or%20lineages%20is%20divided%20into%20several%20clans%20(kula),%20all%20of%20whom%20claim%20direct%20patrilineage%20from%20a%20remote%20but%20common&f=false, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Rajput clans and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Rajput clans, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Rajput clans with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rajput clans. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Rajput clans saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ❤ Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 17:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Alagappa Chettiar 1934.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Alagappa Chettiar 1934.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shahjahan Bhopal.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shahjahan Bhopal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:VK Krishna Menon.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:VK Krishna Menon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Linguisticgeek (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Narasimharaja Wodeyar.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Narasimharaja Wodeyar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sarkar Amma Bhopal.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Sarkar Amma Bhopal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Veena Subbanna Seshanna 1902.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Veena Subbanna Seshanna 1902.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VK Krishna Menon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VK Krishna Menon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Babboor Kamme

The article Babboor Kamme has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Unsourced for years. Such a community does exist - at least in their own minds - but is documented only in passing and on dubious matrimonial websites. That's how castes work: they split and join, creating and morphing identities to suit their own ends.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 17:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ba and Bapu 1910.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ba and Bapu 1910.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Religious liberalism in Rajput courts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Religious liberalism in Rajput courts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious liberalism in Rajput courts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rajput chiefs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Rajput chiefs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"St. Paul's School,(Belgaum)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect St. Paul's School,(Belgaum) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4 § St. Paul's School,(Belgaum) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 06:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]