User talk:Imobuluni

July 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to National Convenience Stores—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 05:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User_talk:Adakiko. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:36, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Convenience Stores. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at National Convenience Stores, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATZET (talk) 05:59, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATZET (talk) 06:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at User_talk:Adakiko.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imobuluni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Imobuluni (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 09:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:ItsDerriz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsDerriz. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 17:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]