User talk:Imleopadilla

Welcome!

Hello, Imleopadilla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dawn Nicole Macandili ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Osplace 01:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alyja Daphne Santiago. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Osplace 01:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rhea Dimaculangan‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Osplace 01:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alyssa Valdez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Osplace 01:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aleona Denise Santiago‎‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Osplace 01:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

The Isa Molde article have no references at all. Since it is a biography of a living person, it is needed to comply with WP:BLP. When you hit the edit button in a BLP you can notice the big Pink Notice about sources message. That is not a joke, take it seriously. WP:UNSOURCED is something you should read. --Osplace 21:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:CIRCULAR any Wikipedia article can be used as a source. How can anyone be named "Best Liberos", that is PLURAL! If two awards were given then, every athlete was name Best Libero, not "liberos". In the Dawn Macandili case, is not sourced that she won that award, it might be deleted anytime. --Osplace 03:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted, not sourced found. Tried AVC, Thai Newspaper, Inquirer, rappler and official site. If you get a source we can fix the award. --Osplace 04:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spiker

A single person cannot be SPIKERS, that is a plural. When two people win the same award, everyone is a spiker not spikers, like you did here and here. --Osplace 01:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Imleopadilla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Risa Sato) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Risa Sato, Imleopadilla!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A nice article and a useful addition to Wikipedia. Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Imleopadilla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Imleopadilla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MT Train^Talk 08:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines women's national volleyball team

Hello, I wanted to let you know that your recent contributions to Philippines women's national volleyball team (this edit) have been undone because it did not appear constructive (i.e. vandalism). If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. – Rick (talk) 10:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippines women's national volleyball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIVB Volleyball World Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jaja Santiago have been undone because you did not provide your source. Rick (talk) 10:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Imleopadilla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Imleopadilla, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Maddie Madayag have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Captain Calm (talk) 09:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Maddie Madayag while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Captain Calm (talk) 09:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Maddie Madayag has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Captain Calm (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katrina Velarde

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katrina Velarde, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 18:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Praxidicae, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd (talk) 18:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop requesting for speedy deletion as what User talk:Praxidicae did to my contribution. Imleopadilla (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And if you edit another article with an inappropriate tag just because I've edited it, you're going to find yourself quickly blocked. CUPIDICAE💕 18:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then cite me an example of an article that I’ve been edited with an inappropriate tag. Imleopadilla (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve created a new page for Katrina Velarde so stop ruining my contribution! Imleopadilla (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Do it again and get blocked. Got it? CUPIDICAE💕 18:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How about User talk:Praxidicae for requesting a speedy deletion of my article of Katrina Velarde? It’s my work! Can’t you understand? Or should I am the one who will block you? Imleopadilla (talk) 18:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am Praxidicae. And you also created a a copyright violation that was nothing more than an egregious advertisement. Also, I'm not an administrator, so I can't block you but one will if you continue your behavior. CUPIDICAE💕 18:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So cite me an exact reference why you request a speedy deletion of Katrina Velarde’s page? Imleopadilla (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don’t have any rights to ruin everyone’s work. I will request a speedy deletion to your page if you still continue your unprofessionalism. Imleopadilla (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You go right ahead and do that. CUPIDICAE💕 18:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I will! Imbecile! Imleopadilla (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Katrina Velarde

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Katrina Velarde has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.filipinosingers.com/katrina-velarde/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katrina Velarde

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katrina Velarde, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.filipinosingers.com/katrina-velarde/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CUPIDICAE💕 19:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]