User talk:ImJustZAZC

ImJustZAZC, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ImJustZAZC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vuparian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vuparian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 03:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ImJustZAZC,

Please create and develop articles in Draft space or User space like your Sandbox. Articles put directly into the main space of the project are subject to review and can be deleted. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fivecards image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fivecards image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vuparian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vuparian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Neo-corelight (Talk) 04:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vuparian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vuparian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vuparian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 21:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ImJustZAZC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not have multiple accounts. This is my only one, me and my friend who I got to make a wikipedia account to help contribute to a wikipedia article for my friend as we believed that it was fine to do. We aren't the same person. I haven't broken any rules regarding anything about multiple accounts and especially for illegitimate reasons as this is my one and only account. ImJustZAZC (talk) 02:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC) ImJustZAZC[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, at least you admit there were multiple accounts. However, none of what you said is anything we can prove or disprove, and look at it from our perspective: if we took everyone at their word when they told us they weren't sockpuppets/ing, what would be the point of having a policy against sockpuppetry? No one would stay blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ImJustZAZC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There were multiple (2) accounts, yes. But only one of them was mine, and it is this one. While as aforementioned, the other belongs to a friend. While I understand that you can't take everybody at their word as that'd obviously result in a disaster. I find it wrong there isn't any effective method to prove that I did or did not violate the rule I was banned for using the available information wikipedia can provide, but so be it. If there is another rule I may have broken, so be it and keep me banned for that reason and not a reason that can only be put up in the air. But, I'd rather prove my innocence on a claim I can disprove on my end as me and my friend were communicating via discord and he mentioned his wikipedia account and things he did on his end and all which I believe would prove my innocence. I'm not entirely sure of the process of how reviewing bans work, so that might not even be allowed. But if it is, please do let me know and I'll get back to you as soon as possible. Either way, thanks for making out the time to read my appeal and all. Thanks again, have a good one. ImJustZAZC (talk) 07:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you describe is meatpuppetry. The Standard Offer is probably your best pathway back to editing. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.