Jump to content

User talk:ImAhmedShahi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:ADMINSHOP

[edit]

Please read it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 15:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read that but THIS IS MY FIRST TIME requesting unblock, I was not able to write anyting in the sockpuppet investigation form.--ImAhmedShahi (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

Please use unblock templates to request unblocking. I will peruse the SPI used to tag your account - if the evidence is sound you shan't be unblocked. Stand by. S.G.(GH) ping! 15:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was not able to write anything on my talk page of User:Ahmed shahi, therefore it was not possible for me to request unblock there because someone locked my talk page.--ImAhmedShahi (talk) 15:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The SPI used WP:CHECKUSER to confirm the following accounts being used in addition to this one:

PosePetal was confirmed in a prior SPI and blocked under the WP:DUCK policy, and comes up here again. Though the Checkuser did not reveal Tasal (talk · contribs · logs) other users had already ruled on that under the same DUCK policy. Checkuser evidence, and DUCK evidence illustrates that you certainly used more than one account in manners not covered by WP:LEGIT, ergo... you shan't be unblocked. At least, not without 1) some seriously convincing evidence, 2) no further socking, 3) after a long period of time. S.G.(GH) ping! 15:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also still have email enabled on the sockmaster account, and can request unblock using the email linked at WP:UNBLOCK. however again I advise you that it will likely not be granted. S.G.(GH) ping! 15:39, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All these accounts were created and used AFTER I was unjustly blocked, except with the case of "PosePetal" which occurred before and I was only blocked for a week. The problem began AFTER this week's block when I was accused of being "Tasal" so I was rightaway blocked and at that time my talk page was locked where I couldn't explain anything to anyone.--ImAhmedShahi (talk) 15:43, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the contribution history of these listed accounts, they didn't exist at the time when MuZmike unjustly indef blocked me. User Tasal is most likely in Canada or Netherland and I'm in Asia.--ImAhmedShahi (talk) 15:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So firstly, you created accounts when your main one was blocked, hence socking. Secondly, Your main account was created on February 3, 2010 and you were blocked on May 25 for block evasion. The following accounts linked to you were created before then:

  • WKTU, November 4 2009.
  • Abluzmirno, February 7, 2010
  • PosePetal, January 29, 2010

So that's three accounts before you were blocked for block evasion, and then several more post-block, including three on July 6 alone. You are guilty of socking, en mass, it's an open and shut job. S.G.(GH) ping! 15:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created WKTU in November 2009 and did very few edits but I didn't like the name so I abandoned it until around June 2010 when I began using it again, after I was unjustly blocked by MuZmike. In early Februrary I was deciding on a name, one was Ahmed shahi and another Abluzmirno (which is a nonsense name, has no meaning or anything) so I cancelled Abluzmirno and began using Ahmed shahi only. "PosePetal" SHOULD NOT COUNT because I was already blocked for a week on that one, you are re-using it to double punishment me with it. You follow unjust rules.--ImAhmedShahi (talk) 15:59, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And it sounds to me like you don't follow rules at all , so...
I think you should get used to the idea that you'll likely never be posting here again. HalfShadow 16:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You enjoy being mean to people you don't even know? This Wikipedia is a United States of America thing and I'm happy that you people from Canada are enjoying it.--ImAhmedShahi (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I literally don't care about you. From appearances, you're a socking little nuisance who is now no longer an issue. At least until you take into your pointed little head to do it again, anyway. HalfShadow 16:25, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your method of debate seems to consist of ordering the sea not to flow towards the land. I have revoked your talk page access on this account. For future (and well considered) unblock requests, email the appropriate emails (to User:Arbitration Committee or those found at WP:UNBLOCK) from your main account, User:Ahmed shahi - email is still enabled for this account. Abuse of this process will mean email is switched off, and more socking will result in unblock requests being declined. S.G.(GH) ping! 17:43, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ImAhmedShahi&oldid=1141525950"