User talk:Ilmulnafia

Welcome!

Hello, Ilmulnafia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Gentoo Linux. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 04:54, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Madhura Raja, you may be blocked from editing. --Let There Be Sunshine 15:01, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Box office collection

There should be proper reference for box office collection. Not some random figures proposed by haters or fans Ilmulnafia (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You describing yourself? You added random figures, initially 74 and then 76, without a "proper reference". While the existing figure was properly referenced. So, stop lying.--Let There Be Sunshine 17:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madhura Raja. For tampering the box office numbers, disregarding the cited source. And Wikipedia do not use WP:PRIMARY sources for controversial data like box office collection. Box office numbers should be added from reliable trade reports, not from the producer himself. Producer's collection is exaggerated, which is evident from the trade reports. --Let There Be Sunshine 11:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Madhura Raja, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Let There Be Sunshine 11:58, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MadhuraRaja Collection

I am from Movie's official team. I have provided enough proof's from zeebusiness & manorama online which shows that movie collected 58.7 Cr in 10 days. Your user let there be sunshine is lieing by destroying our product. We have registered a cyber crime case against the same. We, MadhuraRaja team is not going to spare those who are reducing our movie collection in this wiki. Ilmulnafia (talk) 12:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Case registered

We have registered cyber crime case with Kerala police. We will make sure that the propel who are lying and reducing our movie collection is answerable in court. Ilmulnafia (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Website proofs

We have provided enough proofs which shows that the Collection updated by lettherebesunshine (42 Crores) is wrong. Movie collected well above 58.7 Cr in just 10 days. It's time Wikipedia needs to take action against such liar editors.

https://www.zeebiz.com/india/news-madhura-raja-box-office-collection-blockbuster-mammootty-movie-enters-rs-50-cr-club-95878

http://www.sify.com/movies/madhura-raja-crosses-the-50-crore-mark-news-malayalam-teyjwmebdceff.html Ilmulnafia (talk) 12:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Production team

We have provided enough proofs mentioning 10 days 58.7 Crores. It's reported in zeebusiness website and we have provided the link. What's your proof for 42 crore? Can u provide any better proof which is more credible than zeebusiness?? Ilmulnafia (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]