User talk:Illinois2011/Archives/1
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Archives for July 2007 to January 2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Illinois2011. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
re: Poop
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Poop, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --DodgerOfZion 20:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if I recall correctly, the Invader Zim reference is a brand that is pervasive in the show, as opposed to your addition which is...not. Frequency of appearance is a big factor in notability, as well as precedent; if you'll look in the edit history of the disambig, you will see that your addition is not original, and that it has been struck from the disambig repeatedly. --DodgerOfZion 00:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:Edlogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Edlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Speedy Deletion of Richard H. Holm
Hiya. I've declined the speedy deletion, due to assertaions of importance. However the article may well fail WP:PROF. I'd recommend you take it to WP:AFD. Thanks! Pedro : Chat 10:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duceppe gilles 170h.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duceppe gilles 170h.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:41, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Duceppe gilles 170h.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Duceppe gilles 170h.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
WP:AIV report
Thanks for your report of Terryacoates (talk · contribs). I have removed that report as the user has one contribution, which was the creation of the article of the same name, for which he was warned. Users generally receive several warnings prior to blocking (see WP:UTM. Please respond here if I've missed something. Regards, -- Flyguy649 talk 22:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
In Remembrance...
--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Name
Yes it is. I am of the Niagara Falls, Ontario, Warrens. =P Also, do you happen to know "i_keel_captain_crunch@hotmail.com"? Because if you do I have a big chain link between us. Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 05:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Edit: I checked your contribs, because my gut kinda turned when I saw your message, I thought you were the stalker guy. Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 05:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- See, I know this girl, and she liked this guy named Tyler (last name not Warren), and that Tyler said he knew a Tyler Warren in Illinois or Indiana or something, which I thought was you. Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 06:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Edit: I checked your contribs, because my gut kinda turned when I saw your message, I thought you were the stalker guy. Tyler Warren (talk/contribs) 05:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to WikiProject European Union!
|
Hello, Illinois2011/Archives/1, and welcome to WikiProject European Union! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a European Union Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! | 
|
- J Logan t: 09:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Nürtingen
Welcome to the EU project from me too. I noticed you have put our project tag on the article about Nürtingen. The scope of the project (as described on the project page) mainly includes things like the EU institutions and the EU as a whole, not individual towns in EU member states (unless they have some very special relevance for the EU). Could you check if you still think the project tag is appropriate. Thanks! --Boson 19:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Signature
Hey Illinois2011, what I have done is I created a subpage User:Nat/signature and by doing that I created a template. what I did next is I went to My preferences and placed {{subst:User:Nat/signature}} in the box and then I clicked on the |raw signature box and saved it. nat Lest We Forget. Remember the sacrifice. 23:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rplumber.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Rplumber.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Bill Haley
Thanks for dealing with recent vandalism to Bill Haley. Just so you know I have locked the page down to only registered editors for the time being. 23skidoo (talk) 01:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mozilla Firefox 3.0 running in Windows Vista.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mozilla Firefox 3.0 running in Windows Vista.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Baseball
Cubs or Sox?.....--Buster7 (talk) 04:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I admire the Cards. Bob Gibson, Musial, Ozzie, Orlando Cepeda, Lou Brock (don't remind me!), Pujols, Torre, McGuire (his great year w/ Sammy Sosa), Jim Edmonds ( BTW...Thanks...he may help us win a World Series?). Wouldn't it be awesome to meet (CUBS/Sox) in the Fall Classic....OMG...the world would end!!!!!!--Buster7 (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I also have added alot on info about SIUE. When you have a chance take a look at the page and tell me what you think. arodrig22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arodrig22 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Goldendoodle
I disagree that the images were helpful just because they illustrate some change in appearance or are related to the activity, however I am going to leave them as-is. Please leave your rationale for keeping them on the talk page, because there have been several complaints about the image count, and I think it would be helpful to have why those images are worthy of retention on the record. Jo7hs2 (talk) 23:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nevermind. I see that you already did. ;) Sometimes the brain works faster than they eyes and hands. Jo7hs2 (talk) 23:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Amateur Radio
If you are interested in taking up amateur radio, I suggest a two-pronged approach. First, find your local amateur radio club, and see what resources they can provide. Most of them will be thrilled to hear from you, and you shouldn't need step two. The second step would be to head to your local library or hit Amazon, and get a copy of "Technician Class Element 2 FCC License Preparation" by Gordon West, and "ARRL Ham Radio License Manual: All You Need to Become an Amateur Radio Operator" by the ARRL. Those materials will help you get your entry-level "technician class" amateur radio license. If talking world-wide is an immediate goal, materials for the "general class" will also be required, as the technician license only allows operation on the 6-meter (50mhz) band and higher (up into the gigahertz's ;)), which doesn't really allow international contacts, unless you live near the border. ;) But I seriously recommend finding your local club. You can search for an ARRL-affiliated local club at: http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/club/clubsearch.phtml Have fun!Jo7hs2 (talk) 01:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Main-WoodR-Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Main-WoodR-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Illinois2011 (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Pen lid
Hi Illinois2011!
I declined the speedy deletion of Pen lid. Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Regards, decltype (talk) 08:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome?
Hi, Illinois2011. Ahem. Does this user's sole contribution really merit a welcome mat? Cheers, Rivertorch (talk) 05:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't. Ha. I was going through the account creation log and welcoming new people as they signed up. That edit was after I welcomed them. Illinois2011 (talk) 05:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm. I think it might be better if we let them make an edit before welcoming them. Rivertorch (talk) 05:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I can do that. I was just trying to be friendly. Illinois2011 (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Although I think that it can be quite discouraging when the first welcome you get from a site is telling you that you are doing something wrong (which they are, but that's another matter). Is there policy on this? Illinois2011 (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for moving this all to your page. I was getting dizzy jumping back and forth!
- Friendly is good. But some new editors are like vampires, and you know what happens when you invite them in :-o
- To my knowledge, there is no policy or guideline specific to this issue, although the Welcoming Committee page makes the following suggestion: "Before you welcome users, it is recommended that you check their recent contributions". Your point about not biting newbies is a good one. I try to distinguish between someone who just needs a pointer or two and someone who's being hopelessly unconstructive. The former I will welcome, usually with a non-boilerplate message explaining the matter. The latter...well, it's always a judgment call, but I think we waste a lot of time around here trying to reform people who are indifferent at best to the fact that it's an encyclopedia. Rivertorch (talk) 05:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- I just happened to read your talk page preferences after I had already posted and while I was trying to fix it it got to be, ahem, a mess. Ha. I agree that some people don't want to be reformed. Over the past few days when I was welcoming newcomers, I was doing it as I was checking their edits. Tonight I just happened to have the idea to welcome a few more than usual. I didn't think about it having any negative consequences like you suggest, but that certainly makes sense. I suppose I just worry that the site is lacking in editors. I only recently came back after not having contributed much over the past couple of years and the site seems to be a lot less lively than when I started in 2007. Maybe its just my perception. Illinois2011 (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Might I suggest the new Wiki Guide program which is designed to track certain new editors and their propensity to remain as WikiEditors. All the guides are given a list of 50 or so new editors to contact and assist. User:Royrusso was an editor on my list and is where I saw your warm welcome, etc.Buster Seven Talk 14:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I just happened to read your talk page preferences after I had already posted and while I was trying to fix it it got to be, ahem, a mess. Ha. I agree that some people don't want to be reformed. Over the past few days when I was welcoming newcomers, I was doing it as I was checking their edits. Tonight I just happened to have the idea to welcome a few more than usual. I didn't think about it having any negative consequences like you suggest, but that certainly makes sense. I suppose I just worry that the site is lacking in editors. I only recently came back after not having contributed much over the past couple of years and the site seems to be a lot less lively than when I started in 2007. Maybe its just my perception. Illinois2011 (talk) 06:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Although I think that it can be quite discouraging when the first welcome you get from a site is telling you that you are doing something wrong (which they are, but that's another matter). Is there policy on this? Illinois2011 (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I can do that. I was just trying to be friendly. Illinois2011 (talk) 05:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm. I think it might be better if we let them make an edit before welcoming them. Rivertorch (talk) 05:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Your comment on my talk page
I am really, really sorry I never replied to your post on my talk page several months ago. I haven't been very active lately and I probably more or less phased out at the time I got the new messages notification. I gave a belated response, though it may be irrelevant at this point. I hope you didn't feel shunned by me. Master&Expert (Talk) 01:24, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Can you help?
There's a request out for a reference that needs access to the SIUC library. If you might be in a position to help, please have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#OpenSIUC and JSTOR. Thanks, LeadSongDog come howl! 20:02, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Illinois2011/Archives/1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
You've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.